{
 "id": "LIB2-304",
 "entry_version": 7,
 "class": "OPEN",
 "title": "Derive the configuration-dependent charge-magnitude mechanism",
 "statement": "Can configuration-dependent coherence and screening supply the missing nuclear charge magnitudes under the banked separation-energy baseline?",
 "scope": {
  "carrier": "The nuclear charge sector and refined parent/daughter ledger",
  "domain": "The unresolved charge-magnitude mechanism, distinct from the sign/count record and binding-energy pass tally.",
  "group": null,
  "hypotheses": [],
  "physical_target": null,
  "quantifier": null,
  "real_form": null
 },
 "source_labels_as_printed": {
  "math_status": null,
  "attachment": null,
  "scorecard_tier_word": null,
  "pdf_page": null
 },
 "house_tier": null,
 "review_state": "IN_REVIEW",
 "scientific_status": "OPEN",
 "evidence_status": [
  {
   "kind": "registry",
   "availability": "shipped"
  }
 ],
 "primary_source": {
  "component": "Paper 9",
  "section": "§9, Coherence mechanism is not yet a solution",
  "pdf_page": 137,
  "quote": "The banked candidate mechanism — coherence factors are configuration-dependent (“coherence multiplies by φ”) — names the problem without solving it."
 },
 "caution": "The strong sign/count record does not establish the magnitude law or license a more favourable baseline.",
 "candidate_ids": [
  "C2-072"
 ],
 "basis": {
  "pdf_sha256_prefix": "b64ddcd9e16a6dcd",
  "release": "Rev33.1_S369"
 },
 "relationships": [
  {
   "type": "related_to",
   "target": "LIB2-155"
  },
  {
   "type": "related_to",
   "target": "LIB2-163"
  }
 ],
 "url": "/library-v2/LIB2-304/",
 "content_sha256": "d0008a372988b5a4a7126c350150a03a45fdde05960122a369989952a7549331",
 "build_stamp": "BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02"
}