{
  "V1_discrete": {
    "PASS": true,
    "grok_claimed": 15.077,
    "per_line": {
      "AX6 orbit (N=4)": 2.0,
      "D5 basepoint (N=5)": 2.322,
      "Dirac/Majorana (N=2)": 1.0,
      "J_vac (N=3)": 1.585,
      "N_gen=3 (N=3)": 1.585,
      "Route B (N=2)": 1.0,
      "beta=1 (N=2)": 1.0,
      "exp(t*T_half) (N=4)": 2.0,
      "normal ordering (N=2)": 1.0,
      "sigma_CD class (N=3)": 1.585
    },
    "total": 15.077
  },
  "V1_flags": {
    "J_vac (N=3) / AX6 (N=4) / t* route (N=4)": "ASSERTED, not argued from the shipped selector theorems; house re-count needed against App. E / AX6 orbit census.",
    "sigma_CD (N=3, 1.585 bits)": "QUESTIONED: A1395 \u2014 positivity forces sigma_CD as the UNIQUE positive twisted representative (1 of 8 diagonal automorphisms). Given the standing positivity import, the residual choice may be 0 bits, not 1.585. If the positivity import is itself priced instead, it belongs on a different line."
  },
  "V2_output": {
    "PASS": true,
    "grok_claimed": 36.27,
    "notes": {
      "CKM 4 + mass-proxy 5": "ASSERTED with no line arguments \u2014 9.0 of 36.27 bits (25%) are unpriced. House strict subtotal strikes them.",
      "m_e Koide": "claimed 3.9 vs house 7.24 at 0.66% match \u2014 UNDER-credited by ~3.3 bits with no stated discount rule; if the 0.5-dim Koide input discount is the reason, the rule must be stated once and applied uniformly.",
      "m_mu/m_tau": "claimed 7.7 vs house 8.04 at 0.38% match \u2014 consistent (match-precision crediting, slightly conservative). OK."
    },
    "per_line": {
      "CKM partial (asserted)": {
        "claimed": 4.0,
        "delta": null,
        "house": null
      },
      "delta_CP (~12.5% rel)": {
        "claimed": 3.0,
        "delta": 0.0,
        "house": 3.0
      },
      "m_e Koide (0.66% match)": {
        "claimed": 3.9,
        "delta": 3.34,
        "house": 7.24
      },
      "m_mu/m_tau (0.38% match)": {
        "claimed": 7.7,
        "delta": 0.34,
        "house": 8.04
      },
      "mass-proxy rows (asserted)": {
        "claimed": 5.0,
        "delta": null,
        "house": null
      },
      "theta12 (4% rel)": {
        "claimed": 4.64,
        "delta": 0.0,
        "house": 4.64
      },
      "theta13 (3.2% rel)": {
        "claimed": 4.97,
        "delta": -0.0,
        "house": 4.97
      },
      "theta23 (12% rel)": {
        "claimed": 3.06,
        "delta": -0.0,
        "house": 3.06
      }
    },
    "total_claimed": 36.27
  },
  "V2_strict_floor": {
    "I_out_strict": 27.27,
    "comment": "argued lines only (asserted CKM/mass-proxy struck)"
  },
  "V3_verdict_check": {
    "I_out_claimed": 36.27,
    "L_in_at_6_bits_per_dim": 48.08,
    "L_in_at_8_bits_per_dim": 59.08,
    "finding": "INTERNAL CONTRADICTION: by the return's OWN conservative conversion (>=6 bits/dim), L_in in [48.1, 59.1] EXCEEDS I_out 36.27 \u2014 i.e. its own numbers give I_out < L_in, yet the verdict line claims \"I_out > L_in materially (+8-12 bits)\". The flip is attributed to unexplained \"discounts\". VERDICT NOT PROVEN BY THE SHOWN TABLE.",
    "verdict_follows": false
  },
  "V4_sensitivity": {
    "crossover_bits_per_continuous_dim": {
      "claimed_36.27": {
        "I_out": 36.27,
        "b_star": 3.85
      },
      "koide_restored_30.61": {
        "I_out": 30.61,
        "b_star": 2.82
      },
      "strict_27.27": {
        "I_out": 27.27,
        "b_star": 2.22
      }
    },
    "reading": "I_out > L_in iff each continuous anchor dim costs LESS than b* bits on average. Claimed table: b* = 3.85. Strict floor: b* = 2.22. The entire tautology verdict reduces to ONE methodological number (the price of a continuous anchor), which the return itself marked UNRUN for house re-pricing. This is exactly the Paper-9 complexity-penalty / information-criterion gap (OPEN_ITEMS) \u2014 now with a concrete seed table."
  }
}
ARITHMETIC: PASS (totals reproduce)
VERDICT-FOLLOWS-FROM-TABLE: False
result_sha256: 5a5ba03dfaaba55d
