Claims & Evidence Registrar › H04
Label sentence at the locator (PDF p.48 (bytes of record)):
Because the matrix is built from the standard unitary parameterisation, all six unitarity relations hold identically.
The CKM assembly satisfies all six unitarity relations identically because it uses the standard unitary parametrisation.
| carrier | The standard-form CKM assembly |
|---|---|
| domain | Algebraic unitarity of the assembly, not validation of the chosen entries. |
| hypotheses | Insert the retained entries into the standard unitary parametrisation. |
| physical target | CKM matrix unitarity |
| quantifier | The registered readout and its stated premises. |
Scientific status: UNDER REVIEW — the house has not adjudicated CURRENT / CONTESTED for this record (charter §10.3); a drafted claim is a claim under review, not a result.
Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).
Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.
Paper 3, §2.1, Unitarity of the standard parametrisation — PDF p.50 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS
Because the matrix is built from the standard unitary parameterisation, all six unitarity relations hold identically.
Paper 3, §2.1, Assembly rather than independent success — PDF p.49 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS · the lanes disagreed; resolved by PI ruling R84 as SUPPORTS — a ruling whose gloss the house owes; a use resolved by ruling never anchors PUBLISHED
this section inserts the framework’s four independent entries into the standard unitary parameterisation and checks consistency — so unitarity holds by construction, not as an independent success.
| kind | reference | line / key | availability | note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| analytic | Paper 3 §2.1, Eqs. (5)–(7), pp.47–48 | — | shipped | The suite states the exact unitarity property of the chosen parametrisation; no matrix verification is run here. |
| type | target | licensed by |
|---|---|---|
related_to (never evidential) | LIB2-068 The retained CKM-phase construction remains coincidence-class | — |
| states a predicate | yes |
|---|---|
| uses on the record · unblocked | 2 · 2 |
| uses any lane has read | 2 of 2 |
| REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes | yes (2) |
| a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED | no |
| machine certificate current | yes |
| state | MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| policy | sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| bound to master | aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| checks |
|
A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.
| March library (v1) antecedents | no legacy antecedent identified |
|---|---|
| Track-2 claim ids | D-MIX-H — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record. |
| candidate ids (frozen list S304) | C2-066 |
C2-066 was routed as an overview, not an atomic claim. This record extracts only the explicit construction statement on pp.47–48; the overview itself is not promoted. No tier is inferred from the first-row physical status.
round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 666c94befec1d6b4da6a5980e87c9ff064bffa56e18c6012c7b87d018d167687
Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-071 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.
Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02