Claims & Evidence Registrar › H07

LIB2-179 · The registered stabilizer has no nonzero invariant odd covector

class CLAIMmath status (as printed) NOT_PRINTEDattachment (as printed) NOT_PRINTEDscorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Label sentence at the locator (PDF p.316 (bytes of record)):

The largest stabilizer subgroup preserving J− has no nonzero invariant √ covector there; the constraint stack has full rank with smallest nonzero singular value 1/ 2 [A1556].

Statement

The largest registered stabilizer subgroup preserving J− has no nonzero invariant covector on J−, blocking the attempted invariant scalar row.

Scope

carrierThe odd Albert sector and the largest registered stabilizer preserving it
domainThe invariant-covector attempt, not the state-dependent covariant successor.
hypothesesUse the stabilizer and invariant scalar-row requirement of Appendix T §15.2.
quantifierThe registered construction and its stated premises.
What this does not show. The invariant-row obstruction does not exclude a state-dependent covariant response or determine its physical normalization.

Scientific status: UNDER REVIEW — the house has not adjudicated CURRENT / CONTESTED for this record (charter §10.3); a drafted claim is a claim under review, not a result.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix T, §15.2, Invariant scalar-row attempt — PDF p.334 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · the lanes disagreed; resolved by PI ruling R117 as CONTEXT — a ruling whose gloss the house owes; a use resolved by ruling never anchors PUBLISHED

The first attempt demanded an invariant scalar row ℓodd : J− → R.

Appendix T, §15.2, Full-rank invariant-covector constraint — PDF p.334 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

The largest stabilizer subgroup preserving J− has no nonzero invariant √ covector there; the constraint stack has full rank with smallest nonzero singular value 1/ 2 [A1556].
The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/appendix_t_cartan_observation.tex:985-987): The largest stabilizer subgroup preserving J₋ has no nonzero invariant covector there; the constraint stack has full rank with smallest nonzero singular value 1/√2 [A1556]. (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Appendix T, §15.2, Covariant successor remains possible — PDF p.334 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The well-typed successor is state-dependent and covariant.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kindreferenceline / keyavailabilitynote
computationalA1556; Appendix T §15.2, p.316—unknownThe source reports the full-rank constraint stack. The stabilizer matrices and original computation are not supplied.

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicateyes
uses on the record · unblocked3 · 3
uses any lane has read3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanesyes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTEDno
machine certificate currentyes

Machine certificate (R68)

stateMACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED
policysgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311
bound to masteraad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)
checks
checkresultreason
schema_validPASSexercised
basis_currentPASSexercised
quote_locatedPASSexercised
labels_literalPASSexercised
edges_resolvedPASSexercised
bindings_validPASSexercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedentsno legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim idsF-ODD-01 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
serialsA1556
candidate ids (frozen list S304)C2-134

Drafting-lane note

Invariant-row obstruction associated with C2-134, separate from its inhabited covariant class. The source quote preserves the displaced radical; no singular-value decimal or new covector calculation is added.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 f7c88f241838fe785711f6e3f18a1b39d9c15ce04414775755b174665be20e44

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-179 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02