PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 2 of 2 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-f4731b4cd7b9d97acf0fa962 · master 4759c9dee4bc606c · S339.

LIB2-233 · Retired blanket zero-parameter observable headline

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The archived observable summary presented a blanket zero-parameter headline.

Scope

domain	The old programme-wide headline, not the exactness of individual algebraic formulas.

What this does not show. Retiring the blanket headline does not refute each formula or erase the explicitly loaded map's internal parameter economy.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 0, Claim-language convention, S112 enforcement rule — PDF p.8 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

Phrasings such as “100/100,” “all green,” “zero free parameters” (for the suite as a whole), “closed,” and “emergence” are retired except where a Proved-tier theorem licenses them.

Paper 0, Loaded-map versus whole-suite parameter economy — PDF p.2 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS · the lanes disagreed; resolved by PI ruling R120 as CONTEXT — a ruling whose gloss the house owes; a use resolved by ruling never anchors PUBLISHED

This is a zero-fit claim inside the specified algebraic map, not a claim that the full paper suite has no measured anchors, empirical selection rules, or independent postulates.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Library v1 L71; Paper 0 claim-language enforcement, p.8	—	shipped	The archive supplies the title, not its production body. The suite explicitly retires the blanket wording while preserving a scoped zero-fit interior.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	[Group G: Precision Tests and Anomalies] TIER A-STAR OBSERVABLES — ZERO PARAMETER SUMMARY
where it stood	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, L71; pre-Rev29 blanket observable summary
retiring decision	S112 claim-language enforcement, carried in Rev32.7 Paper 0 p.8; Rev29 row-by-row re-tiering
what the suite prints now	Phrasings such as “100/100,” “all green,” “zero free parameters” (for the suite as a whole), “closed,” and “emergence” are retired except where a Proved-tier theorem licenses them. PDF p.8 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-060 The solar-angle readout is conditional on ordering and the propagation interface, LIB2-063 The framework-angle Route-B readout gives the corrected Cabibbo value, LIB2-124 The mass-formula chains retain three named dimensional anchors
why retired	editorial_rewording + scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `RESULT_CHANGED` → "re-tiering"; `CLAIM_LANGUAGE` → "claim-language"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	L71
serials	s959
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-098

Drafting-lane note

C2-098 is the nearest frozen mixing-summary candidate. L71 is the exact zero-parameter headline antecedent; original production text was not supplied. The narrower zero-fit wording survives in the source. No current tier is inferred for this historical record.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 9fc38c0d26afe1afa45e83b4fc80979397c3ae6fd529cce878fb1fd935e4dde4

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-233 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02