IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-242 · Superseded trimaximal cosine-phase correction apparatus

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 9

Statement

The house carried an erratum to a reported cos δ_TM1 value within the trimaximal (TM1) mixing apparatus; a header added later flags that apparatus as retired; the current print types δCP = −2π/√5 = −160.997° Derived-conditional (Rev29 re-tiering; the pre-Rev29 stamp was Theorem ⋆100).

Scope

domain	The former use of the named cosine-phase erratum in the trimaximal apparatus, not a finding that the correction's algebra is false.

What this does not show. Supersession of the apparatus does not show that the historical erratum was mathematically incorrect.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 5, §3, Retained leptonic-phase readout — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

δCP = −2π/ 5 = −160.997◦

Paper 5, §3, Ordering and propagation-interface premises — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

Normal ordering is assumed; the row is additionally conditional on the Structural Rd ladder and on the undeclared ladder- to-propagation-eigenstate interface (§2); Majorana phases are absent because the operative benchmark assumes Dirac neutrinos

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Candidate C2-152: L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md, S173 SUPERSEDED flag	—	shipped	Only the erratum title and supersession flag are supplied. The original correction formula is not supplied; exact searches for TM1 and trimaximal found no matching suite text.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	L-D115Erratum — cos δ_TM1 Correction; STATUS: ERRATUM (corrects D115 ChatGPT); ⚠ SUPERSEDED (flagged S173, lost-sheep sweep): Part of the retired TM1/trimaximal apparatus (0 hits in the suite); cos δ_TM1 ≈ +0.25 at exact TM1 with θ₂₃ = 45°; This is WRONG. The correct value is:
where it stood	LIBRARY_V2_CANDIDATE_LIST_S304.csv, C2-152: L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md
retiring decision	S173 SUPERSEDED flag for the retired TM1/trimaximal apparatus; not located in suite
what the suite prints now	δCP = −2π/ 5 = −160.997◦ PDF p.84 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-062 The leptonic Dirac-phase readout remains conditional
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `NO_RETIRING_PASSAGE` → "not located in suite"; `LEGACY_SUPERSEDE_FLAG` → "SUPERSEDED"
archive row located	LOCATED — 5 of 5 parts found in `L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md` (sha256 03dab456e27c53c6…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim	L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md, line 3 # L-D115Erratum — cos δ_TM1 Correction L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md, line 7 ## STATUS: ERRATUM (corrects D115 ChatGPT) L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md, line 1 > ⚠ SUPERSEDED (flagged S173, lost-sheep sweep): Part of the retired TM1/trimaximal apparatus (0 hits in the suite). Do NOT re-home into the papers; the suite carries the current value. Kept for provenance only. L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md, line 11 cos δ_TM1 ≈ +0.25 at exact TM1 with θ₂₃ = 45° L-D115Erratum_cosδ_TM1_correction.md, line 13 This is WRONG. The correct value is:
does the archive attest it?	REVIEWED · ATTESTS — re-opened by ruling R125 after a review found a defect in this record; reads before D1343 are kept but no longer count gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — The supplied erratum title targets "cos δ_TM1 Correction", and the note supersedes it as part of the "retired TM1/trimaximal apparatus". (not counted) grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — the archive title is exactly a `cos δ_TM1` correction inside the TM1 apparatus. (not counted) grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1343, A1696) — HIGH — the rows are an `ERRATUM` to `cos δ_TM1` plus a later `SUPERSEDED` header calling the TM1/trimaximal apparatus retired. gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1344, A1697) — HIGH — The archive text supplies an erratum targeting the incorrect $\cos \delta_{\text{TM1}}$ value and explicitly features a header flagging the entire TM1/trimaximal apparatus as retired.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because T-R: no suite use REVIEWED. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
serials	D115
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-152

Drafting-lane note

The original cosine correction is not invented from the title. The V3 readout is the current replacement subject, not a derivation from the old erratum. Its ordering, interface and Dirac premises remain explicit. No numeric legacy ID is inferred from D115 or C2-152.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 3551423bab7a7c0db2cabdb13529d5de304e40c7281a264aa080be5f8ee92099

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-242 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02