IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-243 · Superseded trimaximal condition and rho-modulus apparatus

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 8

Statement

The house once carried a trimaximal condition and rho modulus requiring an extra postulate as part of its mixing apparatus; the current print types δCP = −2π/√5 = −160.997° Derived-conditional (Rev29 re-tiering; the pre-Rev29 stamp was Theorem ⋆100).

Scope

domain	The former operative trimaximal condition and its independent-postulate role.

What this does not show. Retiring this apparatus does not refute its stated postulate independence or derive all current mixing attachments.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 5, §3, Retained leptonic-phase readout — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

δCP = −2π/ 5 = −160.997◦

Paper 5, §3, Ordering and propagation-interface premises — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

Normal ordering is assumed; the row is additionally conditional on the Structural Rd ladder and on the undeclared ladder- to-propagation-eigenstate interface (§2); Majorana phases are absent because the operative benchmark assumes Dirac neutrinos

Paper 3, §5.4, Current atmospheric attachment — PDF p.64 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The current physical θ23 row is therefore Loaded-correspondence; the number and the internal theorem do not move.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Candidate C2-173: L-TM1rho_TM1_condition.md, S173 SUPERSEDED flag	—	shipped	The title explicitly treated the condition as requiring an extra postulate, not as derived. The original condition is not supplied; TM1 and trimaximal were not located in the suite extraction.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	L-TM1rho — TM1 Condition and ρ Modulus; STATUS: INDEPENDENT — TM1 requires 1 extra postulate. NOT derived from J₃(𝕆ₛ).
where it stood	LIBRARY_V2_CANDIDATE_LIST_S304.csv, C2-173: L-TM1rho_TM1_condition.md
retiring decision	S173 SUPERSEDED flag for the TM1/trimaximal apparatus; not located in suite
what the suite prints now	δCP = −2π/ 5 = −160.997◦ PDF p.84 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-060 The solar-angle readout is conditional on ordering and the propagation interface, LIB2-061 The reactor-angle formula retains an unforced round-trip readout, LIB2-062 The leptonic Dirac-phase readout remains conditional
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `NO_RETIRING_PASSAGE` → "not located in suite"; `LEGACY_SUPERSEDE_FLAG` → "SUPERSEDED"
archive row located	LOCATED — 2 of 2 parts found in `L-TM1rho_TM1_condition.md` (sha256 dde6515dbfa78a62…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim	L-TM1rho_TM1_condition.md, line 3 # L-TM1rho — TM1 Condition and ρ Modulus L-TM1rho_TM1_condition.md, line 7 ## STATUS: INDEPENDENT — TM1 requires 1 extra postulate. NOT derived from J₃(𝕆ₛ).
does the archive attest it?	REVIEWED · ATTESTS gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — The archive row pairs the TM1 condition and ρ modulus, explicitly stating it "requires 1 extra postulate". grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — the rows name the TM1 condition and ρ modulus and say TM1 requires one extra postulate.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	3 · 3
uses any lane has read	3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because T-R: no suite use REVIEWED. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-173

Drafting-lane note

This is separate from the cosine-phase erratum G-246: the old objects and assertions differ. The source already denied derivation from the Jordan algebra, and that historical qualification is retained. No missing rho equation is filled in.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 52039039cf202a3a07b93075a83d5f0c12b1342a063fb6300bf81fa25ead4ea9

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-243 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02