IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-244 · Superseded hybrid leptonic-phase formula

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 9

Statement

The earlier house hybrid-phase entry claimed a derived sign while retaining a proposed index and carried a hybrid formula as its leptonic phase target; the current print types δCP = −2π/√5 = −160.997° Derived-conditional (Rev29 re-tiering; the pre-Rev29 stamp was Theorem ⋆100).

Parts of the statement (3)

Each part is a clause of the statement above, cut so that one part makes one claim. A reader naming the clause a quote supports can name the part.

p1 · The earlier house hybrid-phase entry claimed a derived sign (one claim)
p2 · retaining a proposed index (one claim)
p3 · carried a hybrid formula as its leptonic phase target (one claim)

Scope

domain	The physical hybrid-phase target as recorded by the supplied house header.

What this does not show. The replacement readout remains conditional and does not establish equivalence between the old hybrid expression and other phase formulas.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 5, §3, Retained leptonic-phase readout — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

δCP = −2π/ 5 = −160.997◦

Paper 5, §3, Ordering and propagation-interface premises — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

Normal ordering is assumed; the row is additionally conditional on the Structural Rd ladder and on the undeclared ladder- to-propagation-eigenstate interface (§2); Majorana phases are absent because the operative benchmark assumes Dirac neutrinos

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Candidate C2-159: L-HybridDelta_hybrid_CP_phase.md, S173 SUPERSEDED flag	—	shipped	The header supplies the old sign/index status and the flagged hybrid expression. Its full derivation is not attached; the current phase and its premises are printed in Paper 5.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	δ_CP=arg(ω₇·e^{iπ/5})≈−160.9°; STATUS: Y1 — SIGN DERIVED (D161 ★★★★), k=1 PROPOSED (D147, naturalness)
where it stood	LIBRARY_V2_CANDIDATE_LIST_S304.csv, C2-159: L-HybridDelta_hybrid_CP_phase.md
retiring decision	S173 SUPERSEDED flag in C2-159; replacement V3 phase readout in Paper 5 §3 p.84
what the suite prints now	δCP = −2π/ 5 = −160.997◦ PDF p.84 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-062 The leptonic Dirac-phase readout remains conditional
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `LEGACY_SUPERSEDE_FLAG` → "SUPERSEDED"
archive row located	LOCATED — 2 of 2 parts found in `L-HybridDelta_hybrid_CP_phase.md` (sha256 054770ce3f1b77e9…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim	L-HybridDelta_hybrid_CP_phase.md, line 1 > ⚠ SUPERSEDED (flagged S173, lost-sheep sweep): δ_CP=arg(ω₇·e^{iπ/5})≈−160.9° is superseded by the theorem δ_CP=−2π/√5≈−160.997° (p5); the old formula is kept only as an independent cross-check. Do NOT re-home into the papers; the suite carries the current value. Kept for provenance only. L-HybridDelta_hybrid_CP_phase.md, line 7 ## STATUS: Y1 — SIGN DERIVED (D161 ★★★★), k=1 PROPOSED (D147, naturalness)
does the archive attest it?	REVIEWED · ATTESTS gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — The archive text confirms the status "SIGN DERIVED", "k=1 PROPOSED", and includes the hybrid formula combining ω₇ and e^{iπ/5}. grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — the rows keep the hybrid `arg(ω₇·e^{iπ/5})` formula with STATUS “SIGN DERIVED” and “k=1 PROPOSED”.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because T-R: no suite use REVIEWED. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
serials	D161 D147
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-159

Drafting-lane note

The arg expression and mixed sign/index status are copied from the candidate header, not repaired. This target is not silently identified with the distinct subtractive class-algebra formula in G-249. No archive CP title is assigned as an exact ancestor without its statement.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 01131a39aa08ddcf37376abef754e5b3f722e8eb338d5a634eb7b7592dcfe8d7

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-244 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02