PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 3 of 3 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-fafb8b3d2a39bf28ee45578c · master f97433d9e6ce3586 · S339.

LIB2-246 · Retired legacy baryon-to-meson mass ratio

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The earlier ambient-Hessian calculation presented a baryon/meson mass ratio of approximately 6.7 as reproducing one hadron ratio.

Scope

domain	The old free-coupling numerical ratio in the legacy ambient-Hessian parametrization, not the retained cubic-channel argument.

What this does not show. The numerical retirement does not retire the separate tensor-structure statement that the cubic baryonic channel survives the quadratic cancellation.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 8, §4, Historical baryon/meson mass ratio — PDF p.125 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

A self-consistent Faddeev-pole gap equation produced a baryon/meson mass ratio MB /MM ≈ 6.7, matching the PDG proton/pion value 938/140 at a single free coupling α ≈ 0.0025 (the ratio stays in 5–8 across all perturbative α).

Paper 8, §4, Explicit numerical retirement — PDF p.125 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

The number is therefore retired — a legacy null-cone artifact superseded by the current frame, not a parked candidate.

Paper 8, §4, Retained cubic-channel structure — PDF p.125 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The structural content underneath it — that the baryonic (cubic) channel survives the quadratic one-loop cancellation that kills the mesonic channel — is kept in the suite as a theorem (Appendix I, Confinement as the spectral geometry of the cubic norm).

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	L-BaryonMesonRatio; C2-142; Paper 8 §4 p.121; s284/S175	—	shipped	The suite states that the old numeral does not survive the current-frame recompute and explicitly retires it. The original Faddeev calculation and recompute are not executed here.

The numbers this record declares, and where each one's digits come from

This table covers the values this record DECLARES, not every numeral printed on this page: group labels such as E7(7), section numbers and page numbers are not declared values and are not listed here.

value as printed	page	digit source
`6.7`	PDF p.121 (bytes of record)	suite text p.121 only (no kernel line found)

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	M_B/M_M ≈ 6.7 matched the proton/pion value at one free coupling, with a stated ratio range 5–8 across perturbative couplings.
where it stood	C2-142 L-BaryonMesonRatio_mass_ratio_from_algebra.md; historical S23–S24 calculation described in Paper 8 §4 p.121
retiring decision	s284/S175 current-frame recompute; explicit numerical retirement in Paper 8 p.121 and Appendix I p.210
what the suite prints now	The number is therefore retired — a legacy null-cone artifact superseded by the current frame, not a parked candidate. PDF p.121 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-136 The baryonic cubic channel is distinct from the cancelled quadratic channel
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `RESULT_CHANGED` → "recompute"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	3 · 3
uses any lane has read	3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (2)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
serials	s284
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-142

Drafting-lane note

The source explicitly calls the numeral retired, not a parked candidate; its later loose parking phrase is not used to revive it. Broad legacy baryon titles are not exact antecedents for this specific ratio. The surviving tensor structure is G-140.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 8d660755e7b3c522695fafca0c5b95dadd56944afc39ac9e81c6df191c7c385d

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-246 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02