PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 2 of 2 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-724bf25c678d295658c5a275 · master f97433d9e6ce3586 · S339.

LIB2-247 · Withdrawn proof and zero-parameter status of the muon-to-tau ratio

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The earlier charged-lepton account classified the muon-to-tau ratio as proved and carrying zero free parameters.

Scope

domain	The former physical derivation and parameter-status claim, not the continued use of the ratio formula.

What this does not show. The typing is withdrawn while the ratio remains a structural loaded correspondence with its numerical reproduction intact.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 2, §3.2, Former proof/parameter classification withdrawn — PDF p.34 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

Both ingredients were previously typed Proved, and the formula was cited as carrying zero free parameters. That typing is withdrawn.

Paper 2, §3.2, Current two-axis and numerical statuses — PDF p.34 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The rows of this subsection therefore stand at Structural (mathematical tier), Loaded-correspondence (physical attachment) and Reproduced (numerical status): the ratio is reproduced, not derived.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Rev29 re-tiering; Paper 2 §3.2 p.33 and Appendix X p.335; A616/A618	—	shipped	The suite explicitly withdraws the former typing and explains the target-first coefficient provenance. This record does not recompute or refit the ratio.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	The muon-to-tau ratio was printed as Proved / zero-parameter / forced by algebra, no fit.
where it stood	Through-Rev28 ratio classification, described in Paper 2 p.33 and Appendix X p.335; C2-018/C2-056
retiring decision	Rev29 charged-lepton re-tiering, explicitly carried in Paper 2 §3.2 and Appendix X
what the suite prints now	The rows of this subsection therefore stand at Structural (mathematical tier), Loaded-correspondence (physical attachment) and Reproduced (numerical status): the ratio is reproduced, not derived. PDF p.33 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-122 The muon-to-tau formula is a loaded reproduced ratio, LIB2-123 The muon-ratio residual is the multiplicative coefficient gap, LIB2-125 The tau-anchored muon tree estimate inherits the loaded ratio
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `RESULT_CHANGED` → "re-tiering"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim ids	D-LEP-01 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
serials	D616 A616 A618
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-018 C2-056

Drafting-lane note

The old proof rating is not assigned to this historical record or to the current physical formula. The current status words in the replacement quote belong to G-126. Exact dimension identities remain separate from their use as a mass exponent and normalization.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 18ce8d3f3aa95c154b315a21656eced4a695aa0127cb3d9a687509e7db7f4583

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-247 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02