PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 2 of 2 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-09d870287efa65619887c3e8 · master f97433d9e6ce3586 · S339.

LIB2-248 · Withdrawn universal two-parameter mass-completion no-go

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The earlier mass-completion account claimed that every completion with at most two parameters was impossible.

Scope

domain	The withdrawn universal parameter-count exclusion, not the exact single-chi additive class.

What this does not show. Withdrawing the universal claim does not rescue the exact single-chi class or make the fitted harmonic a derived replacement law.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix O, §5, Remark 5.2: withdrawn universal parameter bound — PDF p.276 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

The blanket “≤ 2-parameter completion is impossible” claim is therefore withdrawn; the honest statement is that surveyed one-parameter forms fail and no universal ≤ 2-parameter no-go is proved.

Appendix O, §5, Remark 5.2: fitted counterexample not adopted — PDF p.276 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

a banked-period-70 two-parameter harmonic a cos(6πN/70) + b sin(6πN/70) passes the 0.1% bar at max |∆d| = 3.04 × 10−4 but only fitted (refused adoption); were its two coefficients ever derived, this row reopens.

The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/appendix_o_restmass_program.tex:232-235): a banked-period-70 two-parameter harmonic a cos(6π N/70)+b sin(6π N/70) passes the 0.1% bar at max|Δ d|=3.04×10⁻⁴ but only fitted (refused adoption); were its two coefficients ever derived, this row reopens. (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Appendix O §5, Remark 5.2, p.261; casualty #6 in the Executive State Map	—	shipped	The source withdraws the universal claim after a fitted two-parameter harmonic control. The exact single-chi failure remains; no fitted harmonic is adopted in this round.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	≤ 2-parameter completion is impossible.
where it stood	Earlier mass-completion claim, quoted in Appendix O §5, Remark 5.2 p.261; Executive State Map casualty #6
retiring decision	Withdrawal recorded in Appendix O Remark 5.2 after the fitted period-70 harmonic control; Executive State Map p.7
what the suite prints now	The blanket “≤ 2-parameter completion is impossible” claim is therefore withdrawn; the honest statement is that surveyed one-parameter forms fail and no universal ≤ 2-parameter no-go is proved. PDF p.261 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-106 The exact single-chi additive ratio completion fails on the registered support
why retired	withdrawal — from the record's own words: `WITHDRAWN` → "Withdrawal"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim ids	D-CHI-01 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-055

Drafting-lane note

The replacement narrows the quantifier rather than deleting the tested negative. The harmonic's coefficients remain fitted and its adoption refused; neither its performance nor a new parameter search is computed here. No unprinted retiring assessment serial is invented.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 bc8699ed8490f1532f33d0b8c32252db3c9764939d62a0ed198bb0f7b29bce07

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-248 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02