PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 3 of 3 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-1bfe214be239b36cbbac60a7 · master f97433d9e6ce3586 · S339.

LIB2-251 · Scoped withdrawal of blanket Artin protection for Yukawa loops

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 8

Statement

The earlier renormalization claim treated Yukawa and gauge running as fully protected by Artin without a diagram-by-diagram internal-generator census.

Parts of the statement (2)

Each part is a clause of the statement above, cut so that one part makes one claim. A reader naming the clause a quote supports can name the part.

p1 · The earlier renormalization claim treated Yukawa and gauge running as fully protected by Artin (one claim)
p2 · without a diagram-by-diagram internal-generator census. (one claim)

Scope

domain	The former blanket protection claim for generic cross-block vertex corrections, not Artin protection when two-generated containment holds.

What this does not show. This scope withdrawal does not deny associativity for two-generated subalgebras or refute the separately specified lepton–photon sector.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix A, §A.7.8, Generic cross-block containment gap — PDF p.153 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

for the generic cross-block Yukawa trilinear (three independent split-octonion entries, Paper 6) that containment is not established — momentum conservation constrains momenta, not the number of independent internal octonionic directions

Appendix A, §A.7.8, Corollary 0.16 scope correction — PDF p.153 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

the blanket “fully protected” claim is scoped Rev32.1 pending the generator census (A1538 F5).

Appendix A, §A.7.8, Protected conditional domain — PDF p.153 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

Standard MS renormalisation-group running of Yukawa and gauge couplings from ΛG2 to mZ is protected by Artin’s theorem for diagrams whose internal labels are two-generated

The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/appendix_a_lagrangian_derivation.tex:673-675): Standard MS̄ renormalisation-group running of Yukawa and gauge couplings from Λ_(G₂) to m_Z is protected by Artin's theorem for diagrams whose internal labels are two-generated (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	A1538 F5; Appendix A §A.7.8 pp.147–148	—	shipped	The source restricts the old blanket statement to diagrams meeting internal two-generator containment. The requested census is not supplied or run here.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	Standard Yukawa and gauge-coupling running is “fully protected” by Artin without establishing the internal two-generator containment of each diagram.
where it stood	Earlier blanket Artin bridge, scoped in Rev32.1 Appendix A §A.7.8, Corollary 0.16; C2-114
retiring decision	A1538 F5, Rev32.1 scope correction; Appendix A pp.147–148
what the suite prints now	the blanket “fully protected” claim is scoped Rev32.1 pending the generator census (A1538 F5). PDF p.148 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-088 Generic cross-block Yukawa loops are not yet covered by an Artin generator census
why retired	scope_narrowing + scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `RESULT_CHANGED` → "correction"; `SCOPE` → "scope correction"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	3 · 3
uses any lane has read	3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim ids	A-COLD-SCOPE-01 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
serials	A1538 A633
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-114

Drafting-lane note

The source says scoped, not that every vertex correction fails. RETIRED applies to the unrestricted wording only; the conditional diagram class remains. No loop calculation or new associator contribution is inferred.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 2369d69945c01ffe48f2ab09647a7cb1b59d717c52edbfc377cf0f0f8da8e5aa

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-251 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02