PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 2 of 2 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-ae0271b53afd1d6cffa434ea · master f97433d9e6ce3586 · S339.

LIB2-253 · Retired structural derivation rating of the CKM phase construction

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The earlier CKM phase account gave its readout-conditioned construction a structural derivation rating despite the missing selection of its correction term.

Scope

domain	The former proof and structural-derivation wording, not the retained phase numeral or its comparisons.

What this does not show. The re-tiering does not delete the numeral, supply a correction-term selector or merge the global-fit phase with the direct UT angle.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix B, §B.6, Current phase provenance and retired wording — PDF p.160 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

The Dirac phase δCKM is not of that grade: it is a candidate construction under a named readout axiom (stated immediately below), i.e. a Coincidence-class numeral with an algebraic identity behind it and no selection of G7 (Rev32.5 retype; the Rev29 “Structural claim with a derivation path” wording is retired).

Paper 3, §5.3, Rating withdrawn while the number remains — PDF p.63 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

It drops to coincidence-class and stays there until G7 is derived. The number is not withdrawn; the rating is.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Rev29 re-tiering and Rev32.5 clarification; Appendix B §B.6 p.154; Paper 3 §5.3 p.59	—	shipped	The source retains the phase value while withdrawing the stronger rating. No motivation or selector for G7 is supplied by this record.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	The CKM Dirac-phase construction under F-δ is a “Structural claim with a derivation path” or conditional theorem rather than a coincidence-class numeral.
where it stood	Rev29 F-δ phase wording, explicitly retired in Rev32.5; Appendix B §B.6 p.154; C2-012/C2-065
retiring decision	Rev29 row-by-row re-tiering and Rev32.5 retirement of the remaining structural/conditional-theorem wording
what the suite prints now	It drops to coincidence-class and stays there until G7 is derived. The number is not withdrawn; the rating is. PDF p.59 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-068 The retained CKM-phase construction remains coincidence-class
why retired	editorial_rewording + scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `RESULT_CHANGED` → "re-tiering"; `CLAIM_LANGUAGE` → "wording"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (2)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim ids	D-MIX-08 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
serials	D772 D773
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-012 C2-065

Drafting-lane note

The historical rating and the present coincidence-class construction are separate records. The supplied source, not this drafting round, makes the re-tiering decision. The broad all-green headline is already covered in Part 17.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 c4fd2929723b2a62decbf6d2686b7aaca8b2e0558f0db59ccba6952d70d6e6ca

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-253 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02