PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 2 of 2 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-1dd9be1b688b94017bad7b8f · master f97433d9e6ce3586 · S339.

LIB2-260 · Retired microscopic selector-deriving status of the earlier parent action

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 8

Statement

The earlier microscopic-parent account claimed that its root-line minimum fixed every coefficient without an unselected marking or orientation branch.

Parts of the statement (2)

Each part is a clause of the statement above, cut so that one part makes one claim. A reader naming the clause a quote supports can name the part.

p1 · The earlier microscopic-parent account claimed that its root-line minimum fixed every coefficient (one claim)
p2 · without an unselected marking or orientation branch. (one claim)

Scope

domain	The selector-deriving interpretation of the D1125 action, not its consistency as a loaded finite effective action.

What this does not show. The demotion does not make the loaded finite action algebraically inconsistent or close the physical parent-action problem.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix S, §8.1, Consequence for the earlier parent action — PDF p.308 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

D1125 is killed as a selector-deriving microscopic parent action. It survives as a mathematically consistent loaded finite effective action once TAM , the copy metric and the discrete marking are declared inputs — a demotion of provenance, not an algebraic inconsistency.

Appendix S, §8.1, Corrected coefficient-fixing statement — PDF p.308 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

“all ten C fixed exactly” becomes fixed up to one unselected root-marking torsor point and one orientation branch.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	A1430/s909; Appendix S §8.1 p.292, following D1125/A1429	—	shipped	The source says the return’s own falsifier fired and withdraws the microscopic selector interpretation. The finite effective action is retained under declared loading.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	D1125 supplies a selector-deriving microscopic parent action with “all ten C fixed exactly”.
where it stood	D1125/A1429 parent-action return, corrected by Appendix S §8.1 p.292
retiring decision	D1126/A1430, s909; D1125 falsifier #7 and unconditional KILL-NODE 2 disposition
what the suite prints now	D1125 is killed as a selector-deriving microscopic parent action. It survives as a mathematically consistent loaded finite effective action once TAM , the copy metric and the discrete marking are declared inputs — a demotion of provenance, not an algebraic inconsistency. PDF p.292 (bytes of record)
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `RESULT_CHANGED` → "falsifier"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Typed links

type	target	licensed by
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-021 The finite loaded-profile parent action has its stated stable minimum	—

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (2)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
serials	D1125 A1429 D1126 A1430 s909
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-105

Drafting-lane note

C2-105 is the nearest parent-action candidate, not an assertion that its later finite selector class is identical to the D1125 model. G-025 is navigational only: no cross-action identity or recovery of microscopic selection is inferred.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 2ac25cac4fda57c858695d6e5c5d8c382a1b21161e61fca20cf38c4a54dd8a1f

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-260 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02