PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 2 of 2 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-f4004244c3f39eccf5818180 · master f97433d9e6ce3586 · S339.

LIB2-261 · Retired independent-channel source doorway

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The earlier source model treated the two channel patterns as independent rather than as the images of one common selector contrast.

Scope

domain	The earlier independent-channel model in the selector arc, not a universal prohibition on independent sources in other models.

What this does not show. The paired-source replacement does not select the common contrast or remove the separate arrow-selection problem.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix S, §4, Paired-source replacement — PDF p.304 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

The correct source model (correcting the retired house doorway, casualty #4) is a single common selector contrast, not independent channel patterns.

Appendix S, §4, No selected source encoding — PDF p.304 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

Nothing shipped selects among the three natural encodings

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Appendix S §4 p.288 and casualty #4 p.291; s896-V1	—	shipped	The suite explicitly replaces the independent-channel doorway with the paired-source model. Its CASE-D locus and source encodings are not recalculated.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	The selector’s channel patterns may be chosen independently in the source doorway.
where it stood	Earlier house independent-channel doorway, identified as casualty #4 in Appendix S §§4,7
retiring decision	Paired-source correction, S244–S245 arc; Appendix S §4 p.288 and casualty #4 p.291
what the suite prints now	The correct source model (correcting the retired house doorway, casualty #4) is a single common selector contrast, not independent channel patterns. PDF p.288 (bytes of record)
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `RESULT_CHANGED` → "correction"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
serials	s896
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-105

Drafting-lane note

C2-105 is the nearest parent-selector candidate. The two channel images are one source-model assertion and are therefore not split into separate retirements. The exact retiring assessment serial is not printed beside this correction and is not guessed.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 d3fe2d5466c78461c180a2a09f059c0fdad10912dcadc6b64be1cee230c5c749

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-261 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02