Claims & Evidence Registrar › H09

LIB2-262 · Withdrawn unconditional action preference for the root line

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 8

Statement

The earlier selector account said the action voted for the root line without carrying the common-lift condition required by that preference.

Parts of the statement (2)

Each part is a clause of the statement above, cut so that one part makes one claim. A reader naming the clause a quote supports can name the part.

Scope

domainThe unconditional root-line selection wording, not the common-lift-conditional extremum statement.
What this does not show. The correction neither selects the relative lift axis nor contradicts the explicitly conditional root-line result.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix S, §5, Relative-lift dependence of the action preference — PDF p.306 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

with the relative lift axis ∆θ unpinned, both character types admit nonzero action-critical equivariant points, so the action’s “vote” for the root line is common-lift-conditional only (casualty #5, corrected in place).

Appendix S, §5, Remaining order-arrow status — PDF p.305 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The order arrow stays suggestive, not selected.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kindreferenceline / keyavailabilitynote
registryAppendix S §5 p.289; casualty #5 p.291—shippedThe source restricts the action preference to the common-lift condition. No phase law, critical point or source-arrow selection is computed here.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement“The action votes for the root line” without an additional common-lift condition.
where it stoodEarlier selector-arc action-vote statement, identified as casualty #5 in Appendix S §§5,7
retiring decisionCommon-lift-conditional correction, Appendix S §5 p.289 and casualty #5 p.291
what the suite prints now
with the relative lift axis ∆θ unpinned, both character types admit nonzero action-critical equivariant points, so the action’s “vote” for the root line is common-lift-conditional only (casualty #5, corrected in place).
PDF p.289 (bytes of record)
why retiredscientific_supersession — from the record's own words: RESULT_CHANGED → "correction"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicateyes
uses on the record · unblocked2 · 2
uses any lane has read2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanesyes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTEDno
machine certificate currentyes

Machine certificate (R68)

stateMACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED
policysgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311
bound to masteraad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)
checks
checkresultreason
schema_validPASSexercised
basis_currentPASSexercised
quote_locatedPASSexercised
labels_literalN/Aclass RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
edges_resolvedPASSexercised
bindings_validPASSexercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedentsno legacy antecedent identified
candidate ids (frozen list S304)C2-105

Drafting-lane note

The retired assertion was unconditional selection. The current phase law and same-lift restriction remain source claims; no independent retiring assessment serial or numerical phase choice is added. C2-105 is the nearest parent-selector candidate.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 e53fe5e50f721e8c4557e70f52a5bb3f09e0d4e96078590bef2181473e450176

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-262 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02