Claims & Evidence Registrar › H09

LIB2-265 · Superseded Wyler-baseline route for the muon mass

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The archived muon prompts proposed identifying the muon mass with a Wyler baseline.

Scope

domainThe historical muon-baseline route, not the current tau-anchored ratio or its QED matching.
What this does not show. Replacing the physical baseline does not refute a numerical Wyler evaluation or make the current loaded ratio a derivation.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 2, §3.2, Authoritative charged-lepton attribution — PDF p.36 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

mµ follows from the algebraic ratio formula [A616, A618], re-typed Structural / Loaded-correspondence / Reproduced above and not citable as zero-parameter (Rev29 );

Paper 2, §3.2, Current ratio provenance — PDF p.34 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The rows of this subsection therefore stand at Structural (mathematical tier), Loaded-correspondence (physical attachment) and Reproduced (numerical status): the ratio is reproduced, not derived.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kindreferenceline / keyavailabilitynote
registryLibrary v1 L116/P32; Paper 2 §3.2, Authoritative charged-lepton attribution, p.34—shippedThe archive supplies titles and workflow metadata, not original production bodies. The current-suite replacement is quoted; no historical derivation, numerical result or retirement chronology is independently verified.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statementL116: Muon = Wyler Baseline; P32: Muon = Wyler Baseline (0.141%)
where it stoodLIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, L116 and P32
retiring decisionnot located in suite; current-target replacement by the charged-lepton chain in Paper 2 §3.2, pp.33–34
what the suite prints now
mµ follows from the algebraic ratio formula [A616, A618], re-typed Structural / Loaded-correspondence / Reproduced above and not citable as zero-parameter (Rev29 );
PDF p.34 (bytes of record)
successor recordsLIB2-122 The muon-to-tau formula is a loaded reproduced ratio, LIB2-125 The tau-anchored muon tree estimate inherits the loaded ratio, LIB2-126 The separate QED matching step gives the displayed physical muon mass
why retiredRELATION_NOT_RECORDED — the retiring decision names only what replaced the claim ("not located in suite; current-target replacement in …"); the reason the old claim went was never recorded, and the house does not infer one from a pointer (R42 census S322, ruled R69).
archive row locatedLOCATED — 2 of 2 parts found in LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md (sha256 28f35aac4e91e1ca…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim
LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, line 148
| L116 | library_prompt | 1.C | Fermion Masses — Tree Level | Paper 1 — J₃(𝕆ₛ) and the Standard Model | awaiting_production | prompt_ready | yes | L116: Muon = Wyler Baseline |
LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, line 284
| P32 | proof | 1.F | Foundation Proofs | Paper 1 — J₃(𝕆ₛ) and the Standard Model | awaiting_production | prompt_ready | yes | P32: Muon = Wyler Baseline (0.141%) |
does the archive attest it?REVIEWED · ATTESTS
  • gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — Both supplied archive rows explicitly equate the muon mass to the "Wyler Baseline".
  • grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — L116 and P32 both title the muon as the Wyler baseline.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicateyes
uses on the record · unblocked2 · 2
uses any lane has read2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanesno (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTEDno
machine certificate currentyes

Machine certificate (R68)

stateMACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED
policysgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311
bound to masteraad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)
checks
checkresultreason
schema_validPASSexercised
basis_currentPASSexercised
quote_locatedPASSexercised
labels_literalN/Aclass RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
edges_resolvedPASSexercised
bindings_validPASSexercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedentsL116, P32
candidate ids (frozen list S304)C2-018 C2-056

Drafting-lane note

L116 and P32 explicitly name the same Muon = Wyler Baseline subject. Their original formulas and bodies are not supplied, so this record does not equate either with L259. The archived percentage stays in historical_statement only. This is current-target replacement, not a newly verified mathematical refutation.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 0a5f971bf7d35976dab0e702e74a13d136f5a8b6c254473214f0e3e0ed5e644e

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-265 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02