PUBLISHED under R124 (condition T-R, retired records) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here: this record states what an EARLIER presentation said. Its archive row was located in the files named below, and two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) — one reading this page, one reading the archive text supplied to it — agreed the archive ATTESTS the historical statement; 2 of 2 unblocked suite citations were REVIEWED and none is disputed; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off (NOT_ADJUDICATED); the retired claim is not endorsed — it is recorded as retired; the drafting lane's reads count for nothing. Receipt: condition R124-TR · archive LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, P51 (LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md) · master c7e92a7e45eaadf0 · S342.

LIB2-272 · Superseded cylinder-prefactor proof prompt for the bottom mass

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The archived proof prompt proposed deriving the bottom-mass prefactor from the Peirce cylinder.

Scope

domain	The physical prefactor-origin assertion in P51 at title level, without reconstructing its absent formula.

What this does not show. A title-level replacement does not establish that the absent prefactor proof was executed or mathematically disproved.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 2, §3.6, Current bottom boundary value and offset — PDF p.38 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

The mb row must be quoted with its offset: mb = (7/3)mτ = 4146 MeV against PDG 2026 mb (mb ) = 4186 ± 6 MeV is −0.95% and dcmp = −6.64 (cross-scheme, no status; full precision, Rev32.9).

Paper 2, §3.6, Boundary-value interpretation — PDF p.39 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The mb , mc entries are therefore reported as boundary-value predictions, not as a derived low-energy theorem;

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Library v1 P51; Paper 2 §3.6, Current bottom boundary value and offset, p.37	—	shipped	The archive supplies titles and workflow metadata, not original production bodies. The current-suite replacement is quoted; no historical derivation, numerical result or retirement chronology is independently verified.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	P51: m_b Prefactor from J₂₃ Cylinder
where it stood	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, P51
retiring decision	not located in suite; current-target replacement in Paper 2 §3.6, pp.36–37
what the suite prints now	The mb row must be quoted with its offset: mb = (7/3)mτ = 4146 MeV against PDG 2026 mb (mb ) = 4186 ± 6 MeV is −0.96% and dcmp = −6.67 (cross-scheme, no status). PDF p.37 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-130 The bottom bridge retains its tau anchor and cross-scheme offset
why retired	RELATION_NOT_RECORDED — the retiring decision names only what replaced the claim ("not located in suite; current-target replacement in …"); the reason the old claim went was never recorded, and the house does not infer one from a pointer (R42 census S322, ruled R69).
archive row located	LOCATED — 1 of 1 parts found in `LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md` (sha256 28f35aac4e91e1ca…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, line 303 \| P51 \| proof \| 2.F \| Paper 2 Proofs \| Paper 2 — Flavor Sector from Peirce Perturbations \| awaiting_production \| prompt_ready \| yes \| P51: m_b Prefactor from J₂₃ Cylinder \|
does the archive attest it?	REVIEWED · ATTESTS gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — The proof prompt verbatim states "m_b Prefactor from J₂₃ Cylinder". grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — P51 is titled `m_b Prefactor from J₂₃ Cylinder`.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	P51
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-021

Drafting-lane note

P51 is a proof prompt with no supplied production body. This record covers only its proposed physical origin, as recommended in the source comparison. No prefactor or exponent is borrowed from L138, and no identity between the two old routes is inferred.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 1e84b7b701a82720d60adeaf05a2d5a4a8e055d94a36611c6afb7df957da668e

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-272 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02