IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-277 · Superseded early cubic-phase ansatz for the leptonic Dirac phase

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 8

Statement

The early PMNS phase prompts proposed a cubic-invariant ansatz as the leptonic Dirac-phase target; the current print types δCP = −2π/√5 = −160.997° Derived-conditional (Rev29 re-tiering; the pre-Rev29 stamp was Theorem ⋆100).

Scope

domain	The old bare ansatz target, including only the bare-target clause of L256, not a reconstructed torsion correction.

What this does not show. The new target remains conditional on its readout premises; replacement does not prove that the archived prompt contained a completed derivation.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 7, §7, D4 closed: old ansatz superseded — PDF p.120 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The old ansatz value −133.36◦ is superseded.

Paper 5, §3, Retained leptonic-phase readout — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

δCP = −2π/ 5 = −160.997◦

Paper 5, §3, Ordering, propagation-interface and Dirac premises — PDF p.88 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

Normal ordering is assumed; the row is additionally conditional on the Structural Rd ladder and on the undeclared ladder- to-propagation-eigenstate interface (§2); Majorana phases are absent because the operative benchmark assumes Dirac neutrinos

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Library v1 L130/P44/L256; Paper 7 §7, D4 closed: old ansatz superseded, p.116	—	shipped	The archive supplies titles and workflow metadata, not original production bodies. The current-suite replacement is quoted; no historical derivation, numerical result or retirement chronology is independently verified.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	δ_CP(PMNS) Best Candidate P44: −133.4° [OPEN, 6% gap]; P44: δ_CP(PMNS) from J₃ Cubic Invariant Phase (gap 7.4%); L256 bare-target clause: δ_CP(PMNS) Bare vs Torsion: −133.4° vs PDG −142° [HP9, OPEN]
where it stood	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, L130, its named P44, and the bare-target clause of L256
retiring decision	Paper 7 §7 p.116 explicitly supersedes the old ansatz at Rev29; the exact assessment chain for the archived prompts is not supplied
what the suite prints now	The old ansatz value −133.36◦ is superseded. PDF p.116 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-062 The leptonic Dirac-phase readout remains conditional
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `LEGACY_SUPERSEDE_FLAG` → "supersede"

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	3 · 3
uses any lane has read	3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because no use on it has been read as SUPPORTS by two non-drafting lanes on different objects. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	L130, P44, L256 (in the March index; no page was ever served)
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-007 C2-061

Drafting-lane note

L130 explicitly names P44; L256 contributes only the same bare-phase target. The archive prints −133.4°, while p.116 prints −133.36°; both presentations are retained without recalculation. The replacement phase quote preserves the displaced radical. The prior OPEN flags are not rewritten as prior proof claims.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 ee4ffe5f305b235afa3de4ffb2da25339a0566a769b971b0342c55f3f79a5d2d

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-277 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02