PUBLISHED under R124 (condition T-R, retired records) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here: this record states what an EARLIER presentation said. Its archive row was located in the files named below, and two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) — one reading this page, one reading the archive text supplied to it — agreed the archive ATTESTS the historical statement; 2 of 2 unblocked suite citations were REVIEWED and none is disputed; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off (NOT_ADJUDICATED); the retired claim is not endorsed — it is recorded as retired; the drafting lane's reads count for nothing. Receipt: condition R124-TR · archive LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, L282 ratio clause and L294 (LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md) · master c7e92a7e45eaadf0 · S342.

LIB2-287 · Superseded golden-power ratio of CKM hierarchy magnitudes

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The archived hierarchy proposals identified the Vub-to-Vcb magnitude ratio with a fixed negative power of the golden ratio.

Scope

domain	Only the displayed Vub/Vcb relation of L282 and L294; the separate Rb assertion in L282 is not retired by this record.

What this does not show. This replaces the physical hierarchy ratio only and leaves the separate Rb subclaim unadjudicated.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix B, §B.6, Retained Vub hierarchy relation — PDF p.162 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

|Vub | |Vus ||Vcb |/ 6 = 0.003862

The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/appendix_b_independent_verification.tex:283): |V_ub| |V_us||V_cb|/√6 = 0.003862 (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Paper 3, §5.3, Loaded first-row inheritance — PDF p.63 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

|Vus |, and everything the first row builds on it — |Vub |, |Vud |, first-row unitarity — is therefore loaded.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Library v1 L282/L294; Appendix B §B.6, Retained Vub hierarchy relation, p.156	—	shipped	The archive supplies titles and workflow metadata, not original production bodies. The current-suite replacement is quoted; no historical derivation, numerical result or retirement chronology is independently verified.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	L282 ratio clause: \|V_ub/V_cb\| = φ⁻⁵; \|V_ub/V_cb\| = φ⁻⁵ from R_b · sin θ_C Peirce Suppression
where it stood	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, L282 ratio clause and L294
retiring decision	not located in suite; current-target replacement in Appendix B, p.156
what the suite prints now	\|Vub \| \|Vus \|\|Vcb \|/ 6 = 0.003862 PDF p.156 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-067 The Vub hierarchy relation inherits the loaded Route-B chain
why retired	RELATION_NOT_RECORDED — the retiring decision names only what replaced the claim ("not located in suite; current-target replacement in …"); the reason the old claim went was never recorded, and the house does not infer one from a pointer (R42 census S322, ruled R69).
archive row located	LOCATED — 2 of 2 parts found in `LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md` (sha256 28f35aac4e91e1ca…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, line 236 \| L282 \| library_prompt \| 2.F \| Supporting Library Entries \| Paper 2 — Flavor Sector from Peirce Perturbations \| awaiting_production \| prompt_ready \| no \| CKM Quantitative Scalings: R_b = φ⁻², \\|V_ub/V_cb\\| = φ⁻⁵ \| LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, line 248 \| L294 \| library_prompt \| 1.D \| Mixing/CP \| Paper 2 — Flavor Sector \| awaiting_production \| prompt_ready \| no \| \\|V_ub/V_cb\\| = φ⁻⁵ from R_b · sin θ_C Peirce Suppression \|
does the archive attest it?	REVIEWED · ATTESTS gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — The rows explicitly state the ratio \|V_ub/V_cb\| = φ⁻⁵. grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — L282 and L294 both set `\|V_ub/V_cb\| = φ⁻⁵`.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	L282 (in the March index; no page was ever served), L294 (in the March index; no page was ever served)
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-011 C2-064

Drafting-lane note

Both titles explicitly assert the same magnitude ratio, supporting their consolidation. L282's R_b = φ⁻² and the standalone L293 origin claim are not collateral retirements. No algebraic equivalence between the old power and the present Route-B hierarchy is inferred.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 af27731405e0a83d8b7296e428c008e4fdecc3ae24e4ec4b3a2fc61c27a31551

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-287 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02