PUBLISHED under R124 (condition T-R, retired records) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here: this record states what an EARLIER presentation said. Its archive row was located in the files named below, and two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) — one reading this page, one reading the archive text supplied to it — agreed the archive ATTESTS the historical statement; 3 of 3 unblocked suite citations were REVIEWED and none is disputed; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off (NOT_ADJUDICATED); the retired claim is not endorsed — it is recorded as retired; the drafting lane's reads count for nothing. Receipt: condition R124-TR · archive LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, P64 (LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md) · master c7e92a7e45eaadf0 · S342.

LIB2-294 · Superseded torsion-corrected Cabibbo–Weinberg formula

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The archived Cabibbo proof prompt proposed an arctangent of the golden weak-angle expression followed by a torsion subtraction.

Scope

domain	The Cabibbo–Weinberg construction in P64, not the current independent weak-angle target and loaded first-row readout.

What this does not show. Replacing this formula neither selects the current first-row route nor solves the weak-angle matching problem.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 3, §2, Kernel-line exact-framework Cabibbo readout — PDF p.49 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

the canonical current value is |Vus | = 0.225256 √ (the exact framework angle arctan( 3/ϕ2 ) = 33.4880◦ , printed from the kernel line s1162;

Paper 3, §2, Route-selection provenance — PDF p.49 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The first row is Loaded: Route B was selected after comparison with kaon data.

Paper 4, §7, Current weak-angle target and precision boundary — PDF p.77 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

We therefore carry ϕ−3 as a ∼ 2% structural tree-level target on the electroweak curve, not as a completed Z-pole precision prediction.

The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/p4_higgs_ewsb.tex:339-340): We therefore carry ϕ⁻³ as a ∼2% structural tree-level target on the electroweak curve, not as a completed Z-pole precision prediction. (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Library v1 P64; Paper 3 §2, Kernel-line exact-framework Cabibbo readout, p.47	—	shipped	The archive supplies titles and workflow metadata, not original production bodies. The current-suite replacement is quoted; no historical derivation, numerical result or retirement chronology is independently verified.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	P64: θ_C = arctan(1/φ³) − δ_torsion — Cabibbo = arctan(Weinberg) (gap 1.09%)
where it stood	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, P64
retiring decision	not located in suite; current-target replacement in Paper 3, p.47
what the suite prints now	current value is \|Vus \| = 0.225256 (the exact framework angle arctan( 3/ϕ2 ) = 33.4880◦ , printed from the kernel line s1162; PDF p.47 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-063 The framework-angle Route-B readout gives the corrected Cabibbo value, LIB2-199 The weak-angle value remains a structural target on a scheme-dependent curve
why retired	RELATION_NOT_RECORDED — the retiring decision names only what replaced the claim ("not located in suite; current-target replacement in …"); the reason the old claim went was never recorded, and the house does not infer one from a pointer (R42 census S322, ruled R69).
archive row located	LOCATED — 1 of 1 parts found in `LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md` (sha256 28f35aac4e91e1ca…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, line 314 \| P64 \| proof \| 2.F \| Paper 2 Proofs \| Paper 2 — Flavor Sector from Peirce Perturbations \| awaiting_production \| prompt_ready \| yes \| P64: θ_C = arctan(1/φ³) − δ_torsion — Cabibbo = arctan(Weinberg) (gap 1.09%) \|
does the archive attest it?	REVIEWED · ATTESTS gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — The prompt explicitly proposes θ_C = arctan(1/φ³) − δ_torsion. grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — P64 is `θ_C = arctan(1/φ³) − δ_torsion`.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	3 · 3
uses any lane has read	3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	P64
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-009 C2-062

Drafting-lane note

P64's old torsion term and gap remain title text. The source does not establish an identity between its Cabibbo–Weinberg formula and the current Route-B construction. The replacement quote retains the extraction's displaced radical.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 faee1c9785c83d10177e2f1fe58e326fee63ccf134152b7de34c300b69c937a2

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-294 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02