IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-305 · Supply the missing QCD flip energy in the neutron–proton splitting

class OPENmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 7

Statement

Can a QCD flip energy complete the neutron–proton mass-difference calculation alongside the existing Coulomb/QED contribution?

Scope

carrier	The QCD flip contribution and the existing Coulomb/QED term
domain	The unpriced physical neutron–proton difference, not the selected isospin Casimir coefficient.

What this does not show. No neutron–proton mass prediction or continuous isospin dynamics follows from the registered parity alone.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 9, §9, Isospin sector: unpriced neutron–proton difference — PDF p.138 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The neutron–proton mass difference mn − mp = 1.2933 MeV is unpriced: the framework carries the QED half (Coulomb, with α external) and no QCD half (mu = md at constituent level; the e7 flip carries no energy), so without a flip energy its sign comes out wrong (s1129).

Paper 9, §9, Isospin operation is only a parity — PDF p.138 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

The only registered u ↔ d object is the Os sign map e7 → −e7 (Hu ↔ Hd ; A689 dictionary; read literally, the flip of e7 alone — s1170 shows the phrase also fits full conjugation, and neither map is a Jordan automorphism) — a Z2 parity, not an SU (2)

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Paper 9 §9, p.133; s1129 negative decomposition	—	shipped	The suite identifies the missing QCD energy and the wrong-sign boundary. The decomposition kernel is not supplied or rerun.

Open problem

charter ref	Rev32.7 Paper 9 §9, isospin and neutron–proton paragraph, p.133; s1129
failure or reopen condition	Without the missing flip energy, the source’s wrong-sign result remains; selecting the isospin coefficient does not supply that energy.
obstruction	The registered conjugation has no flip energy, the constituent masses are equal in the stated approximation, and the remaining QED contribution gives the wrong sign by itself.
question	Can the missing QCD flip energy be constructed and combined with the Coulomb/QED contribution?
success condition	Supply the missing QCD flip contribution and a complete calculation of the neutron–proton mass difference, rather than attach an energy to the parity by name.

Typed links

type	target	licensed by
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-160 The fixed-Z isospin coefficient is selected rather than derived	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-161 The registered up–down operation is a parity, not a derived isospin action	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-304 Derive the configuration-dependent charge-magnitude mechanism	—

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because no use on it has been read as SUPPORTS by two non-drafting lanes on different objects. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class OPEN not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim ids	E-NP-01 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
serials	A689 s1129
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-130

Drafting-lane note

C2-130 is OPEN, not a prediction or an Input-tier result inferred from the imported manifest. The source’s displayed mass difference is only quoted as the target; it is not recomputed or freshly checked against external data.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 d3679502657fdfa424f5dec97e1b95ab8163e18668cf54e29001f133b8714e01

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-305 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02