IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-312 · Supply a scheme-matched physical comparison for the top tree estimate

class OPENmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 7

Statement

Can the top-quark tree estimate be given a scheme-matched physical comparison through a derived matching prescription with quantified uncertainties?

Scope

carrier	The top tree-level Yukawa/EW boundary value and its direct/MC mass comparator
domain	The physical interpretation and matching of the top tree estimate, not the internal unit Yukawa weight.

What this does not show. This task does not turn the tree estimate into a pole mass or establish a statistically meaningful mass discrepancy.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix X, Honest precision summary: missing conversion with uncertainty — PDF p.345 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

no such conversion with uncertainty is currently supplied for these rows.

Appendix X, Honest precision summary: direct/MC comparator is a distinct object — PDF p.345 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

PDG 2026 direct-measurement (MC) mass 172.60 ± 0.27 GeV (the cross-section pole mass is a distinct object)

Paper 2, §3.6, Heavy-quark RG/matching audit — PDF p.39 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

Each tension lies on a running curve only for a tuned scale not fixed by the algebra.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Appendix X pp.325–326; Paper 2 §3.6, pp.37–38	—	shipped	The suite states the missing matching and uncertainty calculation and reports a negative untuned audit. No running, conversion or statistical calculation is performed.

Open problem

charter ref	Rev32.7 Appendix X, Honest precision summary and Scheme-label declaration, pp.325–326
failure or reopen condition	The printed untuned running/matching audit is negative; selecting a scale because it fits, or using experimental-error units alone, does not supply a derived scheme-matched comparison.
obstruction	The framework object is a tree-level boundary value, not a pole or MS-bar mass. The displayed direct/MC comparator is distinct, and the tested standard conversion does not remove the offset.
question	Can a derived matching prescription connect the top tree estimate to its named physical comparator with quantified uncertainties?
success condition	Supply the physical mass interpretation and matching calculation with theory, matching and scheme uncertainties in a common comparison convention.

Typed links

type	target	licensed by
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-120 W01 declares the Planck-scale top-Yukawa attachment	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-121 The top tree estimate retains a status-ineligible cross-scheme offset	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-132 The tested untuned running and matching readings do not remove the heavy-quark offsets	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-220 SL-17: Direct/MC top-mass comparator	—

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	3 · 3
uses any lane has read	3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because no use on it has been read as SUPPORTS by two non-drafting lanes on different objects. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class OPEN not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
serials	A713 A724 A1531
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-017

Drafting-lane note

OPEN matching companion to C2-017. The direct/MC mass convention follows Appendix X and G-224; Paper 2's differing pole wording is not silently reconciled. No current top mass, uncertainty or comparator distance is recomputed.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 670493608a4183688b1655baaf1bb27f60530f542768ed43858e4c541fc3cf55

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-312 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02