IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-314 · Derive the constituent-to-running-mass bridge for charm

class OPENmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 7

Statement

Can the constituent-anchored charm bridge be matched to the MS-bar charm mass at its self-scale with an explicit conversion and scheme uncertainty?

Scope

carrier	The constituent-anchored charm bridge and the charm self-scale running mass
domain	The constituent-to-running-mass conversion for charm, not the tau-anchored bottom bridge.

What this does not show. The constituent proxy and exact index normalization do not by themselves determine a scheme-matched charm mass.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 2, §3.6, Missing constituent-to-MS conversion — PDF p.38 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

the bridge is constituent- anchored and no constituent-to-MS conversion or scheme uncertainty is supplied;

The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/p2_mass_hierarchy_resolvent_quintics.tex:401-402): the bridge is constituent-anchored and no constituent-to- MS̄ conversion or scheme uncertainty is supplied; (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Paper 2, §3.6, Required conversion with uncertainty — PDF p.38 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

A scheme- matched significance awaits an explicit conversion with uncertainty.

Paper 2, §3.6, Untuned charm running audit — PDF p.39 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

for charm, running from the strange constituent scale overcorrects downward.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Paper 2 §3.6, pp.37–38; Appendix X Scheme-label declaration, p.327	—	shipped	The source identifies the absent constituent-to-MS conversion and reports the untuned-running failure. No conversion, uncertainty propagation or new fit is performed.

Open problem

charter ref	Rev32.7 Paper 2 §3.6, pp.37–38; Appendix X Scheme-label declaration, p.327
failure or reopen condition	The source reports that running from the strange constituent scale overcorrects downward. An experimental-error-only distance or a fitted scale is not the missing physical conversion.
obstruction	The bridge uses a strange constituent anchor whereas its comparator is a self-scale running charm mass; neither a conversion nor a scheme uncertainty is supplied.
question	Can an explicit constituent-to-MS conversion with uncertainty be derived for the charm bridge?
success condition	Derive the physical constituent-to-running-mass matching and its uncertainty at the named charm self-scale.

Typed links

type	target	licensed by
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-129 The strange constituent proxy carries the printed Casimir modifier	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-131 The charm bridge remains constituent-anchored and cross-scheme	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-132 The tested untuned running and matching readings do not remove the heavy-quark offsets	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-218 SL-15: MS-bar charm mass at its self-scale	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-311 Find a non-residue physical realization of the finite index normalization	—

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	3 · 3
uses any lane has read	3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because no use on it has been read as SUPPORTS by two non-drafting lanes on different objects. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class OPEN not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
serials	A713 A724 A1531
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-022

Drafting-lane note

C2-022's OPEN charm conversion is not merged with the bottom task: the anchors and missing mass definitions differ. The source-reported cross-scheme offset remains on G-135. No physical significance or matching scale is calculated.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 d9fec31eb29be400763a6f3a7cfeb5185b9a7f008aef0b80e1266561df50842f

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-314 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02