Claims & Evidence Registrar › H02

LIB2-337 · Source-equivalence hold on the Jordan-boundary selector header

class NOT_AN_ENTRYmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 7

Statement

Scope

domainThe house Jordan-boundary theorem header and its unverified relation to the suite's selector statements.
What this does not show. Neither a shared vacuum target nor similar theorem wording establishes equivalence of the original assumptions.

Sources in the suite of record

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix A, §A.2, Theorem 0.1: modular/Jordan-boundary sentence — PDF p.141 (bytes of record)
blocked on ruling R3 — the cited source is not in the sealed suite; this use cannot be read against Rev33.1 by anyone until that ruling lands (R62 P2, family A). What R3 is: R3 (S310, Trackers/OPEN_ITEMS.md): a source held only in a house file, outside the sealed suite, is admissible when sha-pinned and labelled — the per-use adjudication under R3 has not been made for this use.

Equivalently, the working vacuum is the unique algebraic attractor of the present modular/Jordan-boundary construction.

Appendix E, §3, Remark 2: distinct conditional selector — PDF p.171 (bytes of record)
blocked on ruling R3 — the cited source is not in the sealed suite; this use cannot be read against Rev33.1 by anyone until that ruling lands (R62 P2, family A). What R3 is: R3 (S310, Trackers/OPEN_ITEMS.md): a source held only in a house file, outside the sealed suite, is admissible when sha-pinned and labelled — the per-use adjudication under R3 has not been made for this use.

DET-7 enters this appendix as a structural postulate, not a derived necessity; the result is therefore a conditional selector theorem.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kindreferenceline / keyavailabilitynote
registryLIBRARY_V2_CANDIDATE_LIST_S304.csv, C2-140; L-AX2_JordanBoundary_conditional_theorem.mdC2-140shippedThe house title and unqualified theorem header are supplied, but its original proof and hypotheses are not. A related suite sentence is located without establishing source equivalence.

Typed links

typetargetlicensed by
related_to (never evidential)LIB2-019 Route A selects the positive golden spectrum under its stated hypotheses—
related_to (never evidential)LIB2-020 Route B selects the positive golden-unit triple under DET-7—

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicateno — a record with no predicate has nothing to clear (NOT_AN_ENTRY)
uses on the record · unblocked2 · 0 (2 blocked on ruling R3)
uses any lane has read0 of 0
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanesno (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTEDno
machine certificate currentyes

Not PUBLISHED because it states no predicate. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

stateMACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED
policysgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311
bound to masteraad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)
checks
checkresultreason
schema_validPASSexercised
basis_currentPASSexercised
quote_locatedPASSexercised
labels_literalN/Aclass NOT_AN_ENTRY not governed by the source_labels rule
edges_resolvedPASSexercised
bindings_validPASSexercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedentsno legacy antecedent identified
candidate ids (frozen list S304)C2-140

Drafting-lane note

The old house header says UNCONDITIONAL THEOREM. The suite does contain a modular/Jordan-boundary statement at p.136, so the subject is not wholly absent; Appendix E p.164 separately states a conditional selector. The missing house body is needed to match their objects and hypotheses. These passages are not silently reconciled, merged or used to retire the old theorem. This refines the ADD1 source hold rather than approving its headline.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 18a6b3a79addd219c9f8b9ff78a639baf37967ea620fc048da1660da8edf38f9

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-337 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02