PUBLISHED under R124 (condition T-R, retired records) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here: this record states what an EARLIER presentation said. Its archive row was located in the files named below, and two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) — one reading this page, one reading the archive text supplied to it — agreed the archive ATTESTS the historical statement; 1 of 1 unblocked suite citations were REVIEWED and none is disputed; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off (NOT_ADJUDICATED); the retired claim is not endorsed — it is recorded as retired; the drafting lane's reads count for nothing. Receipt: condition R124-TR · archive C2-161, L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md; supplied S173 supersession flag (L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md) · master 27190b6a67ce1fcb · S339.

LIB2-345 · Superseded use of the first JUNO oscillation comparison

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 7

Statement

The earlier house neutrino-comparison record used the first JUNO oscillation result as its benchmark.

Scope

domain	The former house benchmark's operative role, not the validity of the experimental result.

What this does not show. Superseding a comparator's operative use does not refute the experimental measurement.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 5, §1, Current comparison basis — PDF p.83 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

The paper therefore keeps the structure simple: the angle set, the phase formula, the current comparison to NuFIT 6.1, and the DUNE-era test scenario.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	LIBRARY_V2_CANDIDATE_LIST_S304.csv, C2-161; L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md	C2-161	shipped	The supplied header flags the old comparison as superseded at S173 and says the papers use NuFIT. The original numerical JUNO comparison and house-file body are not supplied.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	L-JUNOv1 — JUNO First Oscillation Result; STATUS: EXPERIMENTAL (first precision measurement); Comparison with Our Predictions; Tension with JUNO: (0.3185 − 0.3092)/0.0087 ≈ 1.07σ
where it stood	C2-161, L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md; supplied S173 supersession flag
retiring decision	S173 SUPERSEDED flag in C2-161; the precise retiring passage is not located in suite; current benchmark stated in Paper 5 p.79
what the suite prints now	The paper therefore keeps the structure simple: the angle set, the phase formula, the current comparison to NuFIT 6.1, and the DUNE-era test scenario. PDF p.79 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-003 SL-25: NuFIT 6.1 lower-octant atmospheric comparator, LIB2-204 SL-01: NuFIT solar mass-squared splitting comparator, LIB2-205 SL-02: NuFIT atmospheric splitting with SK-ATM, LIB2-206 SL-03: NuFIT atmospheric splitting without SK-ATM, LIB2-226 SL-23: NuFIT squared-sine reactor-angle comparator, LIB2-227 SL-24: NuFIT solar angle in degrees, LIB2-228 SL-26: NuFIT reactor angle in degrees
why retired	scientific_supersession — from the record's own words: `NO_RETIRING_PASSAGE` → "not located in suite"; `LEGACY_SUPERSEDE_FLAG` → "SUPERSEDED"
archive row located	LOCATED — 4 of 4 parts found in `L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md` (sha256 a6378cb4f968d691…) (locator 8db2c73d69dff9f1, S339)
the archive rows, verbatim	L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md, line 3 # L-JUNOv1 — JUNO First Oscillation Result L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md, line 7 ## STATUS: EXPERIMENTAL (first precision measurement) L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md, line 16 ## Comparison with Our Predictions L-JUNOv1_first_oscillation_result.md, line 22 - Tension with JUNO: (0.3185 − 0.3092)/0.0087 ≈ 1.07σ
does the archive attest it?	REVIEWED · ATTESTS — re-opened by ruling R125 after a review found a defect in this record; reads before D1343 are kept but no longer count gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1341, A1694) — HIGH — The archive note explicitly presents the "JUNO First Oscillation Result" as the experimental benchmark. (not counted) grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1340, A1693) — HIGH — the house file is titled JUNO First Oscillation Result with STATUS first precision measurement. (not counted) grok · ATTESTS · THE_RECORD (D1343, A1696) — HIGH — the house file titles the first JUNO oscillation result and uses a “Tension with JUNO” comparison as its benchmark. gemini · ATTESTS · ARCHIVE_TEXT_SUPPLIED (D1344, A1697) — HIGH — The archived record is explicitly titled "JUNO First Oscillation Result" and uses it as the experimental benchmark to evaluate the tension with the framework's predictions.

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	1 · 1
uses any lane has read	1 of 1
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-161

Drafting-lane note

C2-161's own header supplies the supersession flag. JUNO, JUNOv1 and first oscillation were not located in the extraction. No old measurement value, uncertainty or confidence level is invented. The successors are the current NuFIT comparator cards, not measurements derived from the retired source. The truncated house note is not completed from outside context.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 1d81eb4b6134ff3e727658b2a7017029bb4a3766c157ea605a8e06f2dadfe2c6

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-345 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02