IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page: N/A — this record carries no suite quote with a page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-353 · Source hold on the wall-contact operator and pairing-order map

class NOT_AN_ENTRYmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 6

Statement

Scope

domain	The named house wall-contact operator theorem and its pairing-order map.

What this does not show. A similarly named contact term or measure-parity construction does not identify the missing operator theorem.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	LIBRARY_V2_CANDIDATE_LIST_S304.csv, C2-176; L-WallContactOperator_measure_pairing_order.md	C2-176	shipped	The supplied heading names an operator theorem and pairing-order map but gives no definitions, stated theorem or load-bearing-input list.

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	no — a record with no predicate has nothing to clear (NOT_AN_ENTRY)
uses on the record · unblocked	0 · 0
uses any lane has read	0 of 0
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because it states no predicate. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	N/A	no use carries quote+pdf_page
`labels_literal`	N/A	class NOT_AN_ENTRY not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-176

Drafting-lane note

WallContactOperator, wall-contact, wall contact, pairing-order and pairing order were not located. Contact-space, threshold-measure and knot-neck passages are not substituted for the absent theorem. STATUS / LOAD-BEARING INPUTS is only a heading in the supplied row; the omitted premises are not invented. No exact March-library antecedent is inferred from the candidate's keyword hints.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page (VACUOUS — no quote with a page on this record, so this gate tested nothing), G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 795e0cbbaca3293c2e35e0d8a3d3dda7a75dbce9bc518da89febf51057d9a9ff

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-353 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02