IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page: N/A — this record carries no suite quote with a page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-357 · Unidentified additional parity-lemma proposal is not an entry

class NOT_AN_ENTRYmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 6

Statement

Scope

domain	The additional Track-2 parity lemma requested during the discovery pass, with no supplied statement or exact source identity.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	CHATGPT_D1251_ADD1_SOURCE_REVIEW_S304.md, precise source-boundary note	—	shipped	The source review reports that the requested named parity lemma was not identified. The final fixed-extraction search still does not locate its statement.

Typed links

type	target	licensed by
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-084 The mirror ladder reproduces an NS/R parity pattern, not a spin structure	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-333 Source hold on the Roman–clock finite-inventory comparison	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-334 Roman–clock orientation-parity interface remains a proposal	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-340 Source hold on the CKM mixed-parity statement	—

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	no — a record with no predicate has nothing to clear (NOT_AN_ENTRY)
uses on the record · unblocked	0 · 0
uses any lane has read	0 of 0
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because it states no predicate. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	N/A	no use carries quote+pdf_page
`labels_literal`	N/A	class NOT_AN_ENTRY not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-112 C2-124 C2-146

Drafting-lane note

H00: no identified lemma supplies a predicate or domain, so this is the final unprinted-proposal note, not a scientific result. Searches for parity lemma, parity-lemma, Track-2 parity, odd-dimensional, odd multiplicity and even-dimensional eigenspace found no match. The NS/R parity pattern, Roman–clock count comparison, proposed orientation interface and CKM mixed-parity header remain different subjects. Nearest candidate ids are navigational coverage, not asserted lemma identities.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page (VACUOUS — no quote with a page on this record, so this gate tested nothing), G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 cba5e6c28ba112aa3c7e9d7a565d094196a173ba2e3d0c6e814afa8f8eaa7f3e

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-357 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02