Expositions · C04.1 · Registrar
C04.1 · Definitions/conventions
Section of C04.1 — Golden-field selectors and the admissible-gap proof. Section object E-C04.1.definitions-conventions · kind PROSE · cites no record · attestation inherited from the article (R69).
← Claims used · Derivation →
For positive \(a,b,c\) with \(abc=1\), set \[ J=\operatorname{diag}(a,b,c),\quad J^\#=J^{-1},\quad U=a^2+b^2+c^2,\quad V=a^{-2}+b^{-2}+c^{-2}. \] The trace pairing gives \(T(J,J^\#)=3\), so the pair has Gram determinant \(UV-9\). DET-7 is therefore the equation \(UV=16\), not a consequence of unit determinant.
Route A adds equality of the unordered spectra of \(J\) and \(J^\#\). Route B instead requires \(a,b,c\) to be positive algebraic integers in \(\mathbb Q(\sqrt5)\). Here “positive” means positive in the chosen real embedding, not positive at both real embeddings. The positive golden unit \(\phi=(1+\sqrt5)/2\) has a negative conjugate; replacing positivity by total positivity would change the admissible class.
← Claims used · Derivation →
Receipt, script and stdout: on the article page. Registrar master sha256 01d1a5873ede42f5b2c5f4fdcee3a4a74c09a14b99a0deea86a60ebd9c821033 · BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26 22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02