Expositions · Premise notes · PRM-004
PRM-004 · AX-MG
Register page /premises/PRM-004/ · kind POSTULATE · claims declared to rest on it today: none
Drafted by the ChatGPT drafting lane (A1634), verified by the house, published under R76, R78 and R81; house insertions are marked. What a premise note is.
Premise
Register corrected — R81 (D3, S327j). The PI ruled this correction to the register row (Trackers/RULING_R81_S327_PREMISE_REGISTER.md). Statement now (PRM-004/r2,appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:548, qualityEXTRACTION_VERBATIM):One unit affine transfer ≡ one complete normalized Fibonacci cap-cup/Jones interface; boundary amplitudes multiply along the unique rooted geodesic.. Two clauses, coefficient-one and degree-one, each proved independent by exact countermodel (p0:276-280). The register row the drafting lane quotes below is the row as it was supplied to the lane, before R81; it is kept in the register's history (R29: nothing is overwritten).
Register kind: POSTULATE. Located suite statement:
One unit affine transfer $\equiv$ one complete normalized Fibonacci cap-cup/Jones interface; boundary amplitudes multiply along the unique rooted geodesic.
Appendix S · AX-MG — normalized Markov-geodesic boundary coherence · PDF p.294 · appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:548.
The registered excerpt and/or kind needs the scope clarification below; the registry itself is not edited.
What kind of premise this is
POSTULATE is the register kind. The suite explicitly calls AX-MG an axiom, with two independent clauses: coefficient-one and degree-one. The normalized-interface and geodesic multiplication conventions are not derived by the later scalar-shadow extraction. Paper 7 states what would discharge their price: derive a clause from the banked boundary rows without inserting an edge-functor property. The effective operator remains conditional and awaits a positivity/semigroup test. Source status words: AX-MG (two independent clauses, priced, dated) (appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:595).
Where the suite invokes it
Located invocations in the read excerpts, not an exhaustive full-source-tree census. Pages refer to saved Rev32.7 page-delimited text, not PDF-image authentication.
| # | locator | quote (verbatim, ≤ 30 words) | role | argument |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:548Appendix S · AX-MG axiom · PDF p.294 | One unit affine transfer $\equiv$ one complete normalized Fibonacci cap-cup/Jones interface; boundary amplitudes multiply along the unique rooted geodesic. | STATED | Normalized Markov-geodesic coherence |
| 2 | appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:597Appendix S · The boundary question, closed at this tier · PDF p.294 | the coefficient-one clause is load-bearing \emph{by declaration} | LOAD_BEARING | Boundary scalar shadow |
| 3 | appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:616Appendix S · Effective-operator label · PDF p.295 | The law is conditional on AX-MG, value-open, and behind the \texttt{s900} wall | CONDITIONAL | Effective boundary operator law |
| 4 | p7_precision_tests_falsification.tex:243Paper 7 · Premise-discharge tests · PDF p.115 | Exhibit a derivation of either clause --- coefficient-one or degree-one --- from the banked boundary rows without inserting an edge-functor property | MENTIONED | AX-MG discharge test |
| 5 | appendix_e_vacuum_selector.tex:423Appendix E · Coefficient prices have an adjudicated precedent class · PDF p.171 | the \textbf{AX-MG coefficient-one clause} was proved a genuine independent axiom by exact countermodel | MENTIONED | Coefficient-price precedent |
| 6 | appendix_t_cartan_observation.tex:471Appendix T · AX-COT independence theorem · PDF p.306 | the same epistemic shape as AX-MG after its two independence theorems. | MENTIONED | AX-COT pricing analogy |
| 7 | appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:675Appendix X · Layer inventory · PDF p.339 | L3 & boundary and export & $P_{\rm ann}$/$P_{\rm aff}$, caps and interfaces, AX-MG | MENTIONED | Boundary/export layer inventory |
| 8 | appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:689Appendix X · One-sentence layer reconciliation · PDF p.340 | the boundary exports through a pointed affine interface priced by AX-MG and one registration coordinate | LOAD_BEARING | Pointed affine boundary export |
| 9 | appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:716Appendix X · Assumption/attachment and falsifier table · PDF p.340 | boundary state $[g_\rho]$ & $\rho\in\mathbb R/20\mathbb Z$ (one continuous) & AX-MG, two clauses; cross-layer interface | CONDITIONAL | Boundary-state attachment |
| 10 | appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:757Appendix X · The Rev28 kill list · PDF p.341 | AX-MG derivation at the Markov/annular/affine tier, both clauses | MENTIONED | Failed derivation routes |
| 11 | appendix_y_laboratory_notebook.tex:292Appendix Y · Rev28 round ledger · PDF p.364 | positivity-uniqueness closed; AX-MG named | MENTIONED | Recorded non-selection round |
| 12 | appendix_y_laboratory_notebook.tex:293Appendix Y · Rev28 round ledger · PDF p.364 | AX-MG typing: split quantization $+$ \textbf{degree independence} | MENTIONED | Recorded degree-independence round |
House additions — R78-c (S327i)
The house read the rest of the suite for this premise. The material sent to the drafting lane showed at most twelve passages per premise, so A1634 FINDINGS §7 lists 2 hit lines for PRM-004 that the lane never saw. Under R78-c the house read all 2 in the full suite TeX: 2 passages are added below. Every quote was matched against the TeX at its locator. With the lane's table above, every hit of this premise's search keys is now accounted for.
| # | locator | quote (verbatim, TeX source) | role | argument |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | appendix_y_laboratory_notebook.tex:664PDF p.380 | AX-MG, two independent clauses & A1434, A1435 & App.~S | MENTIONED | Laboratory-notebook ledger: where the two AX-MG clauses were shown independent |
| H2 | p0_framework_foundations.tex:276-280PDF p.5 | \textbf{AX-MG is proved a genuine independent boundary axiom in both clauses} (coefficient-one and degree-one) by exact countermodel | STATED | Paper 0 status summary: the boundary question closed at its tier |
Arguments that rest on it
NO RECORD — boundary scalar shadow, appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:595–598: coefficient-one is load-bearing by declaration. NO RECORD — effective boundary operator law, appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:613–618: the text expressly conditions the law on AX-MG. No carrying record is identified in this material, so no unbound ADD is submitted. NO RECORD — pointed affine export and boundary-state attachment, appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:690,716–718. These are explicitly priced/conditional uses, without an identified record in the material.
What breaks without it
Boundary scalar shadow: its coefficient-one source is the declaration itself (appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:597–598). NOT ASSESSED — a replacement coefficient or law without that declaration is not supplied.
Effective law: the printed conditional status cannot be removed; positivity-preservation of the semigroup has not been bank-tested (lines 613–617). The falsifier is the clause-derivation test at p7_precision_tests_falsification.tex:243–247.
Boundary-state/export price: the printed falsifier is a derived edge normalization collapsing the coefficient without the axiom (appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:716–718). NOT ASSESSED — no replacement export after removing AX-MG is supplied.
Registrar sync
Registrar state after R76, R78 and R82 (S327j, master0e1418ad6501767d). Declared today: none (UNKNOWN, not INDEPENDENT). The R78-c reading found no further record whose result assumes this premise. The lane's lines below describe the master as it was supplied to the lane (d0aa26db154ff43f), before these changes.
Declared today in the supplied material, Registrar master d0aa26db154ff43f: none (UNKNOWN, not INDEPENDENT). Draft dispositions — no ADD, CONFIRM or DISPUTE row; there is no declared edge to adjudicate. Unbound NO RECORD arguments are not graph ADDs. No candidate records are supplied. Mentions using AX-MG as an analogy for another coefficient price do not establish a dependency on AX-MG.
Tier and what this does not show
A premise is not a result, and invocation count is not importance. An ADD remains a proposal until house verification under R76; a DISPUTE goes to the PI. No record or premise is upgraded, downgraded, or edited. Unlocated dependencies remain unknown.
Sources
TeX: appendix_e_vacuum_selector.tex:423; appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:548; appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:595; appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:595–598; appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:597; appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:597–598; appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:613–618; appendix_s_selector_ledger.tex:616; appendix_t_cartan_observation.tex:471; appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:675; appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:689; appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:690; appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:716; appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:716–718; appendix_x_zero_parameter_input_ledger.tex:757; appendix_y_laboratory_notebook.tex:292; appendix_y_laboratory_notebook.tex:293; p7_precision_tests_falsification.tex:243; p7_precision_tests_falsification.tex:243–247. Registrar: no carrying record identified in the supplied material. Premise: PRM-004. Suite-cited kernels: s900.
Built by scripts/premise_notes_build.py from Coalition/library/textbook/premise_notes (MANIFEST verified) · Registrar master sha256 e64bfa7ef06444bf9ebd1abb9bf2c9b7562264ad903d1f881f65c38a19ce07be
BUILD_STAMP S328a · 2026-09-11 19:00Z · master e64bfa7ef06444bf · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02