Claims & Evidence Registrar › H07

LIB2-155 · The charge-magnitude ledger retains two exposed proton-separation defects

class CLAIMmath status (as printed) NOT_PRINTEDattachment (as printed) NOT_PRINTEDscorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 13

Label sentence at the locator (PDF p.132 (bytes of record)):

Charge signs and counts are derived; charge magnitudes wander: Sp (9 B) × 1.29, Sp (8 B) × 2.60 under the baseline ruling.

Statement

Under the banked baseline ruling, the proton-separation estimate Sp(9B) is 1.29 times the world value and Sp(8B) is 2.60 times the world value; correct signs and counts do not close the magnitude sector.

Parts of the statement (3)

Each part is a clause of the statement above, cut so that one part makes one claim. A reader naming the clause a quote supports can name the part.

Scope

carrierThe registered charge-sector proton-separation estimates
domainThe exposed charge-magnitude defects, distinct from the binding-energy sharp tally.
hypothesesUse the banked baseline ruling with the refined daughter ledger.; Keep configuration-dependent coherence and screening as unresolved mechanisms.
physical targetProton-separation-energy magnitude diagnostics
quantifierThe registered construction and its stated premises.
What this does not show. The strong sign/count record does not derive charge magnitudes or justify choosing a more favourable baseline after comparison.

Scientific status: UNDER REVIEW — the house has not adjudicated CURRENT / CONTESTED for this record (charter §10.3); a drafted claim is a claim under review, not a result.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 9, §9, Charge-magnitude defects — PDF p.137 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: grok read OUR_QUOTE_AS_PRINTED → SUPPORTS · gemini read OUR_QUOTE_AS_PRINTED → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS

Charge signs and counts are derived; charge magnitudes wander: Sp (9 B) × 1.29, Sp (8 B) × 2.60 under the baseline ruling.
The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/p9_nuclear_cluster_tier.tex:436-439): Charge signs and counts are derived; charge magnitudes wander: Sₚ(⁹B)×1.29, Sₚ(⁸B)×2.60 under the baseline ruling. (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Paper 9, §9, Coherence mechanism remains incomplete — PDF p.137 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: grok read OUR_QUOTE_AS_PRINTED → SUPPORTS · gemini read OUR_QUOTE_AS_PRINTED → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

The banked candidate mechanism — coherence factors are configuration-dependent (“coherence multiplies by φ”) — names the problem without solving it.

Paper 9, §7, Baseline rule — PDF p.134 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role CONTEXT · warrant: grok read OUR_QUOTE_AS_PRINTED → CONTEXT · gemini read OUR_QUOTE_AS_PRINTED → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

Sx (P → D + x) = B(P ) − B(Dledger ) − B(x) with the refined daughter always, where B(x) = 0 for a single emitted nucleon (the case the ruling was banked for) and the bound-fragment term is required otherwise (8 Be→ αα gives 0 at leading order only with it; Rev32.9, A1674 F01; Rev32.10, A1714-F01 — this does not license the open A = 8 alternative baseline)

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kindreferenceline / keyavailabilitynote
registryPaper 9 §§7,9, pp.130,132; A1357 baseline ruling—shippedThe source reports both exposed factors and the baseline rule; no charge-sector magnitude or alternative baseline is calculated.

The numbers this record declares, and where each one's digits come from

This table covers the values this record DECLARES, not every numeral printed on this page: group labels such as E7(7), section numbers and page numbers are not declared values and are not listed here.

value as printedpagedigit source
9PDF p.132 (bytes of record)suite text p.132 only (no kernel line found)
8PDF p.132 (bytes of record)suite text p.132 only (no kernel line found)
1.29PDF p.132 (bytes of record)suite text p.132 only (no kernel line found)
2.60PDF p.132 (bytes of record)suite text p.132 only (no kernel line found)

Typed links

typetargetlicensed by
related_to (never evidential)LIB2-153 The freeze-state ledger records sharp passes and a separately typed obstruction—

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicateyes
uses on the record · unblocked3 · 3
uses any lane has read3 of 3
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanesyes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTEDno
machine certificate currentyes

Machine certificate (R68)

stateMACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED
policysgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311
bound to masteraad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)
checks
checkresultreason
schema_validPASSexercised
basis_currentPASSexercised
quote_locatedPASSexercised
labels_literalPASSexercised
edges_resolvedPASSexercised
bindings_validPASSexercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedentsno legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim idsE-CHG-01 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
serialsA1357
candidate ids (frozen list S304)C2-072

Drafting-lane note

C2-072's magnitude-gap subject is kept separate from the sharp binding ledger. The configuration-dependent coherence description is a candidate, not a completed screening law.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 eac25a1b4beac5273157b388db70baf667881c594300a9b30c770fe5fb654e80

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-155 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02