IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-163 · The separation-energy rule uses the refined daughter ledger

class CLAIMmath status (as printed) NOT_PRINTEDattachment (as printed) NOT_PRINTEDscorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 9

Label sentence at the locator (PDF p.130 (bytes of record)):

The baseline ruling (banked, A1357): separation energies are computed in the ledger category — Sx (P → D + x) = B(P ) − B(Dledger ) with the refined daughter always; neutral excitations cancel only if present in both typings.

Statement

The banked separation-energy rule is Sx(P → D + x) = B(P) − B(Dledger) − B(x), with the refined daughter always and B(x) = 0 for a single emitted nucleon; neutral excitations cancel only when present in both typings.

Parts of the statement (2)

Each part is a clause of the statement above, cut so that one part makes one claim. A reader naming the clause a quote supports can name the part.

p1 · The banked separation-energy rule is Sx(P → D + x) = B(P) − B(Dledger) − B(x), with the refined daughter always and B(x) = 0 for a single emitted nucleon (one claim)
p2 · neutral excitations cancel only when present in both typings. (one claim)

Scope

carrier	Parent and refined daughter objects in the cluster ledger
domain	The declared separation-energy bookkeeping rule.
hypotheses	Use the refined daughter ledger rather than switching to a different daughter baseline after comparison.
quantifier	The registered construction and its stated premises.

What this does not show. The convention does not supply the missing parent-excitation typing or resolve the exposed charge-magnitude defects.

Scientific status: UNDER REVIEW — the house has not adjudicated CURRENT / CONTESTED for this record (charter §10.3); a drafted claim is a claim under review, not a result.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 9, §7, Banked baseline ruling — PDF p.134 (bytes of record)
review state: LANE_PROPOSED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS

Sx (P → D + x) = B(P ) − B(Dledger ) − B(x) with the refined daughter always, where B(x) = 0 for a single emitted nucleon (the case the ruling was banked for) and the bound-fragment term is required otherwise (8 Be→ αα gives 0 at leading order only with it; Rev32.9, A1674 F01; Rev32.10, A1714-F01 — this does not license the open A = 8 alternative baseline)

Paper 9, §7, Exposed consequence — PDF p.134 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT · gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT

filed as an exposed charge-sector magnitude defect rather than baseline-shopped (§9).

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	A1357; Paper 9 §7, baseline ruling, p.130	—	shipped	The supplied source states the baseline convention and its recorded consequence; no alternative baseline is chosen.

Typed links

type	target	licensed by
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-155 The charge-magnitude ledger retains two exposed proton-separation defects	—
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-162 The registered breathing weight is mirror-even and charge-blind	—

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because no use on it has been read as SUPPORTS by two non-drafting lanes on different objects. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Referee findings (R73)

Raised by a lane acting as referee and re-measured by the house before being listed (a lane's word alone is not a finding). Only a CONFIRMED finding against the record's predicate blocks PUBLISHED; the others are printed so a reader sees them.

finding	scope	state	what	evidence	affects this record's predicate?
`A1674-F01` A1674	PREDICATE	CLOSED 2026-09-17	The banked separation-energy rule Sx = B(P) − B(D_ledger) is stated for every emitted fragment x; it is correct only for single-nucleon emission. For a bound fragment the rule must subtract B(x) as well (with the refined baseline). How it was closed: R133 D-2 (PI, S342): Rev32.9 fix S338.1 landed; LIB2-163 re-typed by R130 row 10 (−B(x)); uses REVIEWED in round 22 (A1712/A1713).	p9_nuclear_cluster_tier.tex:293–294 (Rev32.7) paper: REV32.9_CHANGELOG S338.1 (landed in Rev32.9)	closed
`A1714-F01` A1714	PROOF	CONFIRMED	P9 baseline: '8Be->alpha alpha gives 0 only with it' overstates; with the bound-fragment term the ledger gives 0 at leading order only. Record LIB2-163's predicate is unaffected.	SUITE_TEXT_S341 (P9 baseline ruling); p9_nuclear_cluster_tier.tex:311-314 paper: REV32.10 S342.3	no — the predicate is unaffected

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	PASS	exercised
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
Track-2 claim ids	E-CHG-01 — cross-reference; the Track 1 / Track 2 join sets each one against what the sealed suite prints for this record. Where they differ, the suite is the record.
serials	A1357
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-072

Drafting-lane note

Baseline subject under C2-072, separate from the magnitude factors G-159. This is a source-defined rule, not a newly imposed convention or an independent agreement claim.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 82c9e8ca922fd5737d5301798a0e35d47d5484f7098d8bc023771e8b2705fccd

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-163 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02