PUBLISHED under R67 (condition T-B) — NOT house-adjudicated. Build S371a. What PUBLISHED means here (R72): two non-drafting AI lanes (gemini + grok) read this record's anchor citation on different objects and agreed it SUPPORTS the record's statement; no citation on the record is disputed as support; its machine certificate is current. What it does not mean: no person has signed off on this record (adjudication: NOT_ADJUDICATED), the drafting lane's own reads count for nothing, and 2 of 2 unblocked uses were REVIEWED — the rest were read by one lane or none. Every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)); no house tier is assigned. The state is recomputed from the uses on every build and is withdrawn if they stop justifying it. Receipt: condition R67-TB · anchor SU-08537f3c8e6e1dc7a4cd37cd · master 343b9ccf8c503c4f · S339.

LIB2-296 · Superseded singular-vacuum premise of the protection-and-bounce chain

class RETIREDmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state PUBLISHEDentry version 8

Statement

The archived protection-and-bounce chain assumed a vanishing determinant and a vanishing third eigenvalue at the working vacuum.

Parts of the statement (2)

Each part is a clause of the statement above, cut so that one part makes one claim. A reader naming the clause a quote supports can name the part.

p1 · The archived protection-and-bounce chain assumed a vanishing determinant (one claim)
p2 · a vanishing third eigenvalue at the working vacuum. (one claim)

Scope

domain	The singular-working-vacuum premise in L278, not the entire uninspected chain of protection and bounce implications.

What this does not show. The normalization replacement does not exclude singular Jordan elements or independently adjudicate the old Z-mass protection and bounce implications.

Sources in the suite of record

Key — use ≠ record. A review state printed on a source use below names that use — one citation of the suite, read by the lane named in its warrant — not this record. The record's own review state is the one in the table above and is unchanged by any use-level state; a use may be LANE_PROPOSED or REVIEWED while the record it sits on remains IN_REVIEW (R45, R49).

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Appendix I, §6, Remark 6.4: vacuum normalization supersession — PDF p.219 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role SUPPORTS · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → SUPPORTS · grok read THE_RECORD → SUPPORTS

the legacy vacuum normalization diag(ϕ2 , 1, 0) is superseded by the current {ϕ, 1, ϕ−1 } frame, the structural statements unaffected.

The text extraction above lost mathematical typography. Restored from the sealed TeX source (rev32.7/tex/appendix_i_dynamics_bounce.tex:502-504): the legacy vacuum normalization diag(ϕ²,1,0) is superseded by the current {ϕ,1,ϕ⁻¹} frame, the structural statements unaffected. (R87 house restoration: rendered from the tex, not the quote; the quote above is what the machine gate matched)

Appendix E, §1, Hypothesis H0: unit determinant — PDF p.169 (bytes of record)
review state: REVIEWED · role CONTEXT · warrant: gemini read SUITE_TEXT_EXTRACT → CONTEXT · grok read THE_RECORD → CONTEXT

(H0) Unit determinant: Det(Jvac ) = abc = 1.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	Library v1 L278; Appendix I §6, Remark 6.4: vacuum normalization supersession, p.209	—	shipped	The archive supplies titles and workflow metadata, not original production bodies. The current-suite replacement is quoted; no historical derivation, numerical result or retirement chronology is independently verified.

What was said, and what retired it

historical statement	Det(J_vac) = 0 ↔ λ₃ = 0 ↔ M_Z Protection ↔ Bounce
where it stood	LIBRARY_V1_GROK_ARCHIVE_S304.md, L278; legacy vacuum normalization discussed in Appendix I §6
retiring decision	Explicit normalization supersession in Appendix I §6, Remark 6.4, p.209; current unit-determinant premise at Appendix E §1 p.163; exact legacy assessment chain not supplied
what the suite prints now	the legacy vacuum normalization diag(ϕ2 , 1, 0) is superseded by the current {ϕ, 1, ϕ−1 } frame, the structural statements unaffected. PDF p.209 (bytes of record)
successor records	LIB2-047 The working golden vacuum has unit Jordan determinant
why retired	RELATION_NOT_RECORDED — the retiring decision names only what replaced the claim ("not located in suite; current-target replacement in …"); the reason the old claim went was never recorded, and the house does not infer one from a pointer (R42 census S322, ruled R69).

A successor is linked, never "derived from" the retired statement (charter §10.10).

Why this record is PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	yes
uses on the record · unblocked	2 · 2
uses any lane has read	2 of 2
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	yes (1)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class RETIRED not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	L278 (in the March index; no page was ever served)
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-002

Drafting-lane note

The source explicitly supersedes the legacy normalization. L278's full chain is preserved as historical text, but this record retires only its singular working-vacuum premise. It does not equate L278 with an unrelated baryon/meson numeral or deny the separately retained classical bounce.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 4339b5ccf9ee8b10e4dd6ddd6211d95a7db473cf523bbd8f455f35ea10e0c6a5

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-296 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02