IN_REVIEW — NOT CITABLE. Under coalition review; not house-adjudicated. This page was generated (build S371a) from a drafting-lane record. Clearance here is a MACHINE CERTIFICATE under the ruled policy (v1.0 RATIFIED, R68), not a review: it is MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED — contract · quote-on-page · declared numerals: N/A — this record declares no suite labels to check · id resolution · acyclic graph · basis current — and that is a statement about the intake gates, not scientific clearance. It is NOT HOUSE_ADJUDICATED: no person has signed off on this record, and 0 of 357 records have been. No tier has been assigned by the house; every label shown is the label as printed in the suite of record (Rev33.1_S369 (PDF sha256 b64ddcd9e16a6dcd…)). Adversarial review by a lane that did not draft it is also still owed. Nothing on this page may be cited as a result of the programme until its state reads PUBLISHED — a state written only by the R67 transition producer when a REVIEWED SUPPORTS use, read by two non-drafting lanes, stands on the record's predicate.

LIB2-352 · Source hold on the T-matrix versus propagator residue comparison

class NOT_AN_ENTRYmath status (as printed) —attachment (as printed) —scorecard tier word (as printed) none printedhouse tier not yet assignedreview state IN_REVIEWentry version 7

Statement

Scope

domain	The house distinction between a T-matrix residue and a propagator residue in the baryon-feedback calculation.

What this does not show. A bibliography-style pointer neither proves the residue relation nor retires it with the neighbouring historical mass ratio.

Sources in the suite of record

Quotes are verbatim from the sha-pinned text extraction of the Rev33.1 PDF (A1584 §2.2, S309): mathematical typography — radicals, exponents, ≅ — can appear displaced in the extracted line. The PDF page is authoritative; the quote is what the machine gate matched.

Paper 8, §4, Historical hadronic source pointers — PDF p.125 (bytes of record)
blocked on ruling R3 — the cited source is not in the sealed suite; this use cannot be read against Rev33.1 by anyone until that ruling lands (R62 P2, family A). What R3 is: R3 (S310, Trackers/OPEN_ITEMS.md): a source held only in a house file, outside the sealed suite, is admissible when sha-pinned and labelled — the per-use adjudication under R3 has not been made for this use.

Library: L-BaryonMesonRatio, L-FaddeevEvasion, L-A144, L-TMatrixResidue, L-HybridMassGap.

Evidence (availability is not outcome)

kind	reference	line / key	availability	note
registry	LIBRARY_V2_CANDIDATE_LIST_S304.csv, C2-174; L-TMatrixResidue_baryon_feedback_coupling.md	C2-174	shipped	The residue-comparison heading is supplied, and Paper 8 names the house file. Neither gives the original definitions, relation or proof body.

Typed links

type	target	licensed by
`related_to` (never evidential)	LIB2-246 Retired legacy baryon-to-meson mass ratio	—

Why this record is not PUBLISHED (R67, condition T-B)

states a predicate	no — a record with no predicate has nothing to clear (NOT_AN_ENTRY)
uses on the record · unblocked	1 · 0 (1 blocked on ruling R3)
uses any lane has read	0 of 0
REVIEWED SUPPORTS use on the predicate, read by two non-drafting lanes	no (0)
a SUPPORTS use on the predicate is DISPUTED	no
machine certificate current	yes

Not PUBLISHED because it states no predicate. The transition is written only by the R67 producer and recomputed by a gate on every build; no person promotes a record by hand.

Machine certificate (R68)

state MACHINE_CHECKS_PASSED

policy sgtoe-clearance-policy-1.0-RATIFIED · sha16 ef7d6e7690514311

bound to master aad7a3ec6ce3b510 (the master the checks ran on; issued 2026-09-26T05:06Z)

checks

check	result	reason
`schema_valid`	PASS	exercised
`basis_current`	PASS	exercised
`quote_located`	PASS	exercised
`labels_literal`	N/A	class NOT_AN_ENTRY not governed by the source_labels rule
`edges_resolved`	PASS	exercised
`bindings_valid`	PASS	exercised

A certificate says the record is well-formed, current, quote-on-page, label-literal, edge-resolved and binding-consistent on the bytes it was issued on. It is not a review, and it goes STALE the moment the master moves under it (R68). It is one conjunct of the PUBLISHED condition (R67), never the whole of it.

History

March library (v1) antecedents	no legacy antecedent identified
candidate ids (frozen list S304)	C2-174

Drafting-lane note

L-TMatrixResidue is located at p.121 only as a source pointer. T-Matrix Residue, propagator residue and the R_T/Z_B spellings did not locate the asserted comparison. The page's numerical baryon/meson retirement concerns a different predicate. No relation between these residues, feedback coefficient or LSZ normalization is inferred from that pointer.

Receipt

round D1253 · parsed 2026-09-06T00:06Z · machine gates passed: CONTRACT, G1-quote-on-page, G2-numerals-declared, G4-ids-resolve, DAG-acyclic · content sha256 dc8abd05c79ad79b4114abd34129c01c437b0895087aa1e550820c137df4b2f4

Review this entry

Reviewer verdict line (one per entry, as text): LIB2-352 | PASS or FAIL(G1–G8) or NOT RUN | quote | PDF page | one sentence. G1 source supports the exact scoped assertion · G2 evidence class fits (numbers ≡ digit source) · G3 labels as printed, not converted · G4 comparison typed · G6 public scope · G7 history real · G8 caution present and true. Machine surfaces: index.json · capsule.md.

Generated from library_v2.jsonl. Declared volatile fields (R36): BUILD_STAMP.
BUILD_STAMP S371a · 2026-09-26T22:53Z · master 01d1a5873ede42f5 · cut 9dcc6ce9a8ee3e02